Thursday, March 16, 2023

Economics, Political Scheming and Sheer Ignorance

 

                      Economics, Political Scheming                      and Sheer Ignorance                                                      

         In a recent installment regarding Ron DeSantis’ ongoing attempt to morph into Huey Long: I recently alluded to the 200-man state security response force, answerable to him which DeSantis wants authorization to create. He also has mentioned recreating the "Florida Guard", a WWII measure now defunct. He said it would be useful, “In case the National Guard were all deployed” (which has not and will not ever happen!) Keep in mind that they would be answerable, unlike the National Guard, only to the governor. We now have another Governor initiative to place his hand on the control of state functions which should function according to law, not the Governor’s dictates. The latest piece of garbage from this miserable idiot is his statement that he wants to create a 50-person state “election security” commission.

        Bear in mind that the state of Florida already has election laws and election security is a significant part of that. However, what De Santis proposes almost conveys the message that there's rampant election fraud in the state of Florida and these guys, on the state’s dime and under his authority, are needed to protect our election security. Bear in mind that, even without such a commission, other states, especially in the South, have created laws or made decisions that do things such as prohibit giving water to people standing in long lines waiting to vote. While the premise for such legislation has not been explained, it seems fairly obvious. Additionally, we have heard the rationales, in places like Georgia, for closing some polling places because they're “too far out in the country” or they're “unnecessary” all of which applies predominantly to persons of color and/or low income, many of whom cannot simply take off work to vote early or take off to vote at all. 

    There have been very few valid claims of any attempted election fraud in the state of Florida. In recent (last several years) charges of election fraud, or I should say illegal voting, county officials have brought such charges, not state officials. Ironically, in The Villages, where I reside, all five people charged with illegal voting were Caucasian Republicans. This looks a lot less like the solution to a problem then an attempted power grab by the governor of the state of Florida who has higher aspirations. As I have said many times before, we deserve so much better than this person.

        Sometimes it is unnecessary to unmask a racist by your own efforts because they do it themselves out of their own ignorance. An example of such a lapse of judgment comes from none other than the Senate Minority Leader himself, Mitch McConnell, the senior Senator from Kentucky. Rarely does the Klan sheet slip as far as this. Before a vote to move the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act to the Senate floor failed last session, McConnell was asked by a reporter about concerns among voters of color. Believe it or not, he then said:

        "Well, the concern is misplaced, because if you look at the statistics, African American voters are voting in just as high a percentage as Americans.”  As Americans? Who the hell is he referring to? The last time I looked the United States Constitution, the 15th Amendment erases any racial differentiation for voting. Apparently, in Mr. McConnell’s opinion, African Americans are not only children of a lesser God, but children of different citizenship status as well.

        In other news which makes one shake their head, Eric Trump, who I would characterize as the stupid one but it's a dead heat with his older brother, actually said, “When will someone fight for my dad? Apparently, Eric was out of the country on January 6th when armed supporters of his father invaded the US Capital on his behalf. In the context of the original question, the answer posed was that maybe his supporters have bone spurs and just can't manage the fight.

Of course, Don Junior, never one to be “out-stupided” by younger bro, in the wake of the current Silicon Valley Bank debacle said: “I don’t remember banks collapsing under Trump… but don’t worry guys it’s only a matter of time till Biden/media blames him for that too. It has nothing to do with high interest rates / fed rate hikes necessitated by record inflation caused by his out-of-control spending.”

    So, what’s wrong with that? Start with this: According to the Federal Deposit Insurance Commission (FDIC), there were actually 15 bank failures during Trump's presidency: four in 2020, four in 2019 and seven in 2017. Additionally, Harvest Community Bank, which was located in New Jersey, closed on Jan. 13, 2017, a week before Trump took office. I guess Don Jr. just has his dad’s faulty memory for unpleasant facts, huh? 

    Sadly, his father’s gutting of Dodd-Frank was a harbinger of present events. A key part of attempting to prevent investment bankers from playing fast and loose with other people’s money was the Volker rule, passed in 2010 as part of the Dodd-Frank package of regulatory attempts to avoid another recession inducing event like the 2008 housing bubble collapse, triggered by some of America’s largest investment banks simply lying to investors about the reliability (as in their investment grade ratings) of bundled mortgages. (Read or watch “The Big Short”). In brief, the Volker rule prohibited banks from putting their own capital in high-risk investments, particularly since the government is guaranteeing all of their deposits. What Trump Jr., aka Doofus Don, is apparently unaware of are the following facts:

1. His father ran higher deficits than Biden’s which Trump Jr bitches about. The data?  In FY 2022 total government spending was $6.27 trillion and total revenue was $4.90 trillion, resulting in a deficit of $1.38 trillion, a decrease of $1.40 trillion from the previous fiscal year.  The 2021 budget was Trump’s and contained a record $2.8 trillion dollar deficit.

2. On June 25, 2020, the Volcker Regulators relaxed part of the rules involving banks investing in venture capital and for derivative trading. Who was then President?

3. SVB - Venture capital provider to many. Bad low interest investments. We know the result.

        Sometimes, even those few people of the Republican persuasion that we think may actually have a conscience and may actually have rational thought processes, disappoint us as well. A case in point is Mitt Romney who, although I disagree with his sense of economics, I have always felt was an honorable man. A recent statement of his with which I take issue is not a case of moral integrity but of skewing the facts to fit his own narrative. In statement to reporters, Mr. Romney stated that, “Americans are 7% poorer now because of Biden inflation.” So, what's wrong with that? Well, in much the same way that blaming any president for the price of gasoline, which is a market product and subject to shortages and other market pressures, is a fool’s mission, blaming the president for the inflation which is the natural result of such shortages leading to price increases in the market economy so praised by conservatives and John Stossel who is simply a moron, indicates a very poor grasp of economic realities.

        When commodities are in short supply, those that have them charge more for them. Why? Because they can. It is a simple fact of life and an economic reality described by Adam Smith, in 1776, in his classic work on economics, the Wealth of Nations. Inflation and, for that matter, the economy as a whole is not, and never has been, (since Andrew Jackson) in the control of the President. If it were that simple, Mitt, there would be no recessions. In fact, this concept is a cornerstone of high school economics classes.

        What makes this statement even more misleading than just simply blaming President Biden is the fact that during the same period of time average wages in the United States have increased by 4.7% which means that income is increased and while not as greatly as inflation rates, inflation will taper off as supply chains level out, but wages will not be decreased accordingly.

        Economics, like Sociology and others, is a “soft” science. One plus one doesn’t always yield the desired and expected “two.”  In reality, starting with an eight-month slump in 1945, the U.S. economy has weathered 13 different recessions since World War II.

     If “fixing” these events was as simple as the GOP wishes us to believe, then we could and we would. It isn’t and we can’t, and a significant part of that is human greed. This is exacerbated by people who actually know little or nothing about economics listening to, and parroting, drivel and outright prevarication from people like the Trump brothers and their father, apparently economic dunces and happy to lie about it.   

Thursday, March 9, 2023

Student Loan debt: The Eduscam

 

Student Loans- The Eduscam

Once again, I find myself embarrassingly in agreement, at least in one narrow principle, with John Stossell, that apostle of free market price gouging and exploitation. Unexpectedly, in a recent column he stated that success can be obtained without accumulation crushing student debt. I agree with the statement, although why he felt it a topic for an op-ed I don’t know, since I feel that statement is a priori true without explanation. But…being me, I thought I’d elaborate in several areas, especially as SCOTUS  recently dealt a case which resulted in them  kiboshing  the Biden administration’s intended “forgiveness” of some student loan debt. What is overlooked is that the "forgiveness" would apply debt remaining after the principal on the loan had been repaid.  

        The first is that far too much student debt is incurred by young folks who apparently think that there is special knowledge available in another state which no one in their home state comprehends or can confer.

        Example: The undergraduate 2021-2022 tuition & fees at the University of Central Florida was $6,368 for Florida residents and $22,467 for out-of-state students. The Florida resident got the identical educational opportunity for 350% less.

          This is orders of magnitude more skewed in private vs public universities. Example: The bright eyed young 2021 freshman at Notre Dame (where home of record is no factor) could look forward to a total tuition and fees cost of $246,800 by graduation in 2025. That’s a huge price to pay for content which is available in any university, for perspective, that amounts to a home mortgage sized debt incurred over four years while the mortgagee isn't earning!

        I found it oddly significant that there was also a promo in the news for an HBO production related to the Sackler cartel family, owners of Perdue Pharma (oxycodone’s purveyor and drug pushers to millions). Like the Sacklers, who encouraged doctors to prescribe a drug they knew to be addictive yet claimed that it wasn’t, many tuition aid offices, are more like pre pre-housing bubble mortgage brokers, and low end loan sharks, in that they routinely encourage young (and financially naïve) persons to accumulate a crushing debt load with promises that they’ll be easily able to pay it off with the “High salaries they’ll earn as grads of good old Podunk University.”

        Average 2022 Student Loan Debt in The United States among student loan borrowers in America was $32,731, according to the Federal Reserve. This is an increase of approximately 20% from 2015-2016. Most borrowers have between $25,000 and $50,000 outstanding in student loan debt. More than 44 million Americans had some student loan debt unrepaid as of 2021!

        Notre Dame is high, but not the worst and several Evangelical Christian Schools are ridiculously high. Jerry Falwell’s Liberty U, will set the borrower back $160,000 for a BA in “Bible.” Good old TCU will set you back $250,000 for tuition. But wait…living on campus will cost another $80,000, for a potential debt load of a third of a million. To live in Texas, for Christ’s sake!??

        In summary, the cost of information isn’t the same, although the quality of said education may well be. So why do so many students go to schools outside the state and accumulate such debt? Vanity is a big factor, closely followed by “Mom and Dad went there.” Bard college, a small liberal arts college in upstate New York will set you back right at $300,000 for a BA in English, but not to worry, there is no minimum SAT or ACT score requirement and they are “test optional” in classes. Needless to say, they have a high acceptance rate and graduation rate. Quality of education? Who knows? (In the interest of full disclosure, Bard did produce Donald Fagen and Walter Becker, the two guys who became Steely Dan!)

        It is, at least to me, statistically significant that a mere 3% of the UF student body are non-residents, so it is obvious that in-state tuition rates “pay the bills” and the astronomically higher out of state rates are just free money. Also remember that the head football coach at “good ole Florida” makes (I didn’t say “earns”) $7.1 million annually. This is equivalent to the tuition for more than 1000 Florida resident students!  

        Second issue – tuition aid “consumer” ignorance. Sadly, the average American is less than sagacious in manners of money at age 22, therefore, unlike the financial aid office which, in truth, “sells” loans, they are easy prey for suggestions such as “Think of it like credit card payment’” or “your U. of B.S. degree will earn you enough to cover it easily.” It is a fact that many young couples buying a first home are just as innocent and just as easy prey for those who “sell” loans. Read “The Big Short” for more validation of this statement.  

        These youngsters are frequently the first to find out that their student debt load can make them essentially ineligible for a home mortgage or even, in some cases, credit cards. Debt is debt to a banker, period. The average  required student loan payment in 2019 was well in excess of $450 monthly. A 10 year payoff on a $150,000 student loan at 7% will require a monthly payment of $1742 monthly. That’s just under half of the OCPS beginning teacher gross starting salary! Mortgage lenders typically like to see the payment at less than 25% of net salary.

        My point: knowledge is knowledge, whether it comes from a Community College or university lecture hall and, in fact, class size at the CC level is generally far better. Additionally, a diploma from a major state university will not have a notation that you did the first two years at a CC while living at home and paying the $5000 two-year degree cost from your part-time gig as a nude Jello wrestling color announcer.

        Part the second: “But shouldn’t everyone go to 4 years of college.” Nope. Currently in Florida there are numerous local two-year tech degree programs in medical fields, data systems, etc, leading to profitable employment with essentially no student debt. Technical training available even in high school is a path to financial stability. In Orange County, Florida, several High school VoTechs produce students ready to enter fields in which they will earn more than many beginning jobs requiring a four year degree. As of January of 2023, the average apprentice electrician in Florida (a non-union, low wage, state) earned over $50,000 annually, several thousand dollars higher than a beginning teacher with a four-year degree! (And no student debt!) That income also provides opportunity for further education, if desired, without accumulating a crushing debt load. Based on national averages, that new teacher might see that starting pay reduced by over $5500 annually due to student loan repayment!

Everyone should be trained or have access to training to perform a job in their field of interest which someone will pay them a decent wage to do. This may require a degree, but many do not. The plumber who bills $55 per visit doesn’t need one. Air Conditioning techs don’t. X-ray techs with a 2-year Community College diploma make $60,000 annually in Florida, 2-year degreed Dental Hygienists between $63,350 and $77,830.

 We hear a lot of bitching about manufacturing jobs being exported offshore. How many of those jobs require a college education? Approximately none! The person who can repair my air conditioning, fix my plumbing or electrical problems or repair my automobile may well make more over a career than the college graduate who becomes a teacher. That's not necessarily “right”, in my opinion, but it is true.

Friday, January 27, 2023

More Lies of the Right

 

                           More Lies of the Right


        The Lie: Quoted verbatim From Trump campaign website, Jan 6, 2023:  As president, Donald Trump “marshaled the full power of government to stop deadly drugs, opioids, and fentanyl from coming into our country. As a result, drug overdose deaths declined nationwide for the first time in nearly 30 years."

The truth: while opioid deaths decreased very slightly in 2018, the deathrate per 100,000 increased in 2019 and, in 2020, took the largest increase in the past 20 years and was at an all-time high when Trump left office. Meanwhile, the biggest contributor to opioid deaths — synthetic opioids, which include fentanyl, which Trump referred to specifically in his statement — rose all four years that Trump was in office. Surprise, Trump lied! Note that this is a meaningful (apples to apples) statistic, since it shows deaths per 100,000 population, not as a percentage if the population as a whole.

 Another Far Right liar:

        We’ve all seen the fallout from Damar Hamlin’s sudden cardiac arrest following a blow to the chest in a recent Monday Night Football game. Thankfully he is now recovering, thanks to professional trainers and immediate CPR. However, ever anxious to discredit COVID vaccines, Conservative commentator Liz Wheeler tweeted data which, she claimed, showed Hamlin’s incident was part of a larger trend, linked to COVID vaccination. She claimed: "1 in 5,000 young men have heart issues from COVID vax.” “Yearly commotio cordis cases? ~15. (RARELY over age 20)," Note: commotio cordis is what can happen when a blow to the area of the heart coincides exactly with timing which interrupts the electrical stimulation of regular function. It can cause ventricular fibrillation and, if not immediately dealt with, death within minutes. It is NOT a "heart issue", but an externally caused trauma.  

        Wheeler then proceeded even farther off the rails as she continued: "1,598 athlete cardiac arrests since Jan 2021. 69% fatal. (Average athlete cardiacs before vax was 29/yr)," Wheeler tweeted Jan. 3. "‘Science’ ignores this. That’s why people ask questions."

        Her obvious intent here is to have the reader believe her implication that the number of athlete cardiac arrests has increased by a factor of more than 5,500 percent due to Covid vaccines. This is a classic example of why Mark Twain famously said, “There are three kinds of lies; Lies, Damned lies, and Statistics. Ms. Wheeler has masterfully incorporated all three into one whopper.

The first two data points in Wheeler’s tweet have some germ of truth, however there are issues even with that. The 5,000 figure comes from a September 2021 New York Times story. But the article cited unconfirmed and worst-case assumptions data used by vaccine regulators to create risk/reward estimates and worst-case scenarios. She knows these are not real numbers. She just wants the reader to assume they are.

 The statement that what happened to Mr. Hamlin is rare, is accurate. It is also essentially irrelevant. It (commotio cordis) happens rarely, but more frequently, to boys playing Little League baseball being struck in the chest by a pitched ball. Even so, the most recent figures (2020) for the injury are thirty events annually, not fifteen as Wheeler states. It is also now more frequently recognized for what it is than even ten years ago.

Even the inference that a vaccine is responsible for an injury which has happened just once in a violent sport where currently 1696 and historically, 26,682, NFL players have beat each other up on a weekly basis, is simply ludicrous. Furthermore, there have been no identified instances in the currently more than 73,000 NCAA football players, the vast majority of whom are vaccinated in both cases.

Now for the “Big Lie.” Ms. Wheeler leads with, “There have been 1,598 athlete cardiac arrests since January 2021, with 69% being fatal."   She wants you to believe that these are all due to COVID vaccines. This number comes from an unvetted, unconfirmed, list of global incidents that includes nonathletes of all ages and non-cardiac injuries and deaths.  Numerous actual medical professionals in the specific field of sports cardiology have strenuously rejected these figures and consistently reaffirmed that they have seen no increase in cardiac arrests among athletes in 2021 or 2022 and have found no correlation between cardiac events and the COVID-19 vaccines.

And another whopper: Congressman Scott Perry, R(Pa), stated several days ago (early January 2023) that "We're talking about parents that go to school board meetings for the schools that they pay for with their taxes and having the temerity to question the curriculum, and then they're put on, you know, the red flagged, they’re flagged by the Department of Justice and the FBI for attending a meeting, "That's not what America is supposed to be about. That sounds like some tinhorn Third World dictatorship."

No, Jethro, what it actually sounds like is the reaction to the continued and increasing attacks, extending even to death threats, on educational services personnel from bus drivers to teachers to school board members. No one who goes to a school board meeting and engages in a respectful and meaningful dialog is being “flagged.” If, on the other hand, their behavior is sufficiently inappropriate to indicate the possibility of future violent behavior, then that’s a bit different.  A great deal of this concern stems from the deliberate attempts of some, such as our Florida Governor, to generally discredit public education and as the Soviets did under Stalin, teach “modified” or sanitized versions of some subjects such as history. This extends to book banning and simply refusing to allow students to think critically when presented the opportunity.

Think I’m kidding?  This is a note sent to the daughter of a Loudoun County, Virginia, School Board member: “It is too bad that your mother is an ugly communist whore.”  “If she doesn’t quit or resign before the end of the year, we will kill her, but first, we will kill you!”

In Dublin, Ohio, an anonymous letter sent to the School Board president vowed that officials would “pay dearly” for supporting education programs on race and mask mandates to stop the coronavirus. “You have become our enemies and you will be removed one way or the other,” it said.

Must of this stems from the MAGA crowd, who first heard the term “critical race theory,” actually taught almost nowhere but law school, from Trump’s nattering, and definitely not as part of public school curricula. Like most “dog whistle” phrases this further polarizes those most susceptible to such drivel. It raises a legitimate concern when these marginalized and potentially violent folks do things such as rip masks off school officials or other parents at the same meeting.

 In Rochester, Minnesota, members faced continuing threats and outbursts at meetings over mask mandates, critical race theory and other hot-button issues. The board president said her son grew so concerned that he insisted on driving her to board meetings and waiting in the parking lot to ensure her safety.

Northwest Allen County school board meetings in Indiana became so heated last fall that police officers assigned to the district refused to continue providing security unless the board took action to rein in its increasingly unruly meetings, according to an email sent by a school resource officer to the board president. Sergeant Kevin Neher wrote to the board president at the time, Kent Somers, “I truly am concerned for the safety of everyone at those meetings as are the other officers who have worked them.”  

This is, in my opinion, simply an extension of the Far Right wing of the GOP weaponizing dissent by fanning the flames of ignorance with political rhetoric. This was Newt Gingrich’s stock in trade and Trump’s business methodology even before politics. Those who blindly follow are easily manipulated by those who know it isn’t so, but want the reaction they know their exaggerations will evoke within their deplorable and easily led fan base. In any case, taking precautionary action when confronted with the very real threat of violence isn’t government overreach, but rather the fulfillment of its duty to protect its citizens.

How we got here: On Oct. 4, 2021, Attorney General Merrick Garland sent a five-paragraph memo to the FBI and federal prosecutors acknowledging a "disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence" against school officials. Garland directed the FBI to hold meetings across the country and bring together government leaders to discuss strategies to address those threats. In that directive, Garland specified: "While spirited debate about policy matters is protected under our Constitution, that protection does not extend to threats of violence or efforts to intimidate individuals based on their views." The memo focused on criminal conduct, not parents’ views about COVID-19 policies or school curriculum. A Trump-nominated judge even dismissed a case by parents challenging Garland’s memo. The judge concluded that the memo does not target protected conduct under the Constitution and covers only criminal conduct. And yet, here we are. 

Even earlier, our unindicted Medicare Fraud perp and now Florida Senator, Rick Scott, said this in October of 2021:  "Joe Biden’s attorney general wants the FBI to go after parents for speaking out at school board meetings to protect kids from radical curriculum like critical race theory." Again, dog whistle tactics from a known liar. “Critical race theory” is the new whipping boy. It isn’t being taught in public schools nor in most non-law school college curricula. Remember that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the subject of the most protracted filibuster in the History of the US Congress. Those who opposed it are the political antecedents of those who now manipulate constituents  into open hostility against current social movements. Thanks Governor DeSantis and Senator Scott.

Finally: Public Education was, at one time the aspect of our societal culture which set us above much of the rest of the world.  It is indicative of the effects of the above internal turmoil on Public schools that 46% of teachers interviewed in a recent survey indicated that they were either already planning to quit or were open to other, less stressful employment. Make no mistake, the children of these parents who threaten teachers and school board members are, themselves, frequently imbued at home with the same predisposition to inappropriate and, all too frequently, violent behavior.   

And I do believe that’s all I have to say about that.   

Monday, January 23, 2023

Deficit Reality Therapy

 

                 Deficit Reality Therapy

 

We are constantly bombarded with massively misleading rhetoric and outright lies by those of the far right. On the one hand we are treated to bitching and moaning related to the “debt ceiling.” If it were just that simple, I would tend to agree on the principle that spending more than you bring in is unsound fiscal policy. It doesn’t work on the microscopic scale (personal family finance), and it is a dangerous concept in the macroscopic (national policy) as well. 

        One of the recent key differences, with which Adam Smith was non-conversant, is what has become known as “Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), which holds that, as long as an entity can just make (print) more money, they can never run out. The problem with that is that the concept of “full faith and credit” on which MMT relies, is intangible, based on consumer and borrower expectation, not tangible assets, of which we hold some (gold) but nowhere near enough to cover our debt obligation.

 Fort Knox currently holds roughly 147 million troy ounces (4,580 metric tons) of gold bullion, while the Federal Reserve vault in New York houses an additional 6,190 tons. At today’s gold price that means the value of the US gold reserve is about $700 billion. The projected federal deficit or 2023 alone is $1.2 trillion. For the math challenged, that means that we will borrow more than the value of all that gold in storage, and that would still mean an increase in the federal debt, which currently stands at about $31.4 trillion.  Just the annual interest obligation on this monstrous debt as of December 2022, was $210 billion, or 15% of the total federal spending!   

The odd part is that typically, the national debt resulting from deficits usually surges in times of national recession, or war time spending. As an example, in 2008, when the housing bubble collapsed due to grossly underregulated and financially disastrous financial sector operations, Gross National Product decreased as foreclosures spiked unemployment and the outgoing Bush administration enacted a $700 billion “bailout” bill. (remember “too big to fail?”) This coupled with greatly increased unemployment compensation and social service demands led to three years of significant deficits. By the end of the second Obama term, the deficit was back down to a lower level than 2008.

        Enter Donald Trump. While touting the “greatest economy ever” the deficit and, accordingly the debt, soared. In consecutive years the deficit rose, spiked by decreased federal revenues due to Trump’s tax cut, which was a valentine to the wealthy, just to peak at a deficit of $984 billion in 2019, just in time for Covid.  Tax Foundation analysts stated that the tax cuts would cost $1.47 trillion in decreased revenue while adding only $600 billion in growth. In other words, reduce taxes, increase deficit and debt. Which brings me to my second big lie.

The second mammoth falsehood being purveyed by the Right is that the Biden administration request for funding for more IRS agents is aimed at the average taxpayer (read that as “voter”) instead of its actual intent, which is to improve the function of the IRS as specified by law. Understand this:  thwarting the legitimate efforts of the IRS is of essentially no positive consequence to the “average” taxpayer and of none to any honest one. So, what’s the point?

While none of us enjoy paying taxes, as responsible citizens we do so because a free lunch is chimerical. Roads, social services, national defense, etc. all cost money and all are necessary. Oddly enough and overlooked by the “laissez faire” unregulated economy crowd, is the fact that even Adam Smith, himself, opined that those who make more from the economy should pay more for the privilege. While he didn’t use the term “graduated tax,” he implied it, way back in 1776, in “The Wealth of Nations”.

The real focus of current GOP anti-IRS fiction is that maybe, just maybe, those one-percenters who avoid anything close to their fair share (such as paying zero income tax [Trump] for several years while claiming to be wealthy) might actually be held accountable for honestly honoring the tax code. Think I’m kidding?

 Congress has systematically underfunded the IRS. Today, the IRS has as many employees as they had in 1970, and the technological system that they're using to drive tax processing was built in the 1960s before we went to the moon. As a result, wealthy individuals have all of the capacity to be able to try and avoid their taxes, and the IRS has few resources to be able to go after them. They also have armies of lawyers who can help them avoid taxes.

        This also affects the honest taxpayer, but in much the opposite sense.  Last tax year (2021), the IRS received 230 million phone calls and only had 15,000 people to answer those calls, which meant that each person had to answer 16,000 calls. Trust me, the “one-percenters” aren’t those calling the IRS for help. While many Americans, who don’t have tax lawyers, feel that every day, what Congress has actually done is to starve the IRS of the resources it needs to enforce legitimate tax collection from many of the wealthiest Americans, who are the least likely to pay their taxes.

The United States currently collects less tax revenue as a percentage of GDP than at most points in recent history, in part because owed but uncollected taxes are so significant. The so-called tax gap has surged in the last decade. The last official estimate from the I.R.S. was that an average of $441 billion per year went unpaid from 2011 to 2013. Current estimates are more than double that. Most of the unpaid taxes are the result of evasion by the wealthy and large corporations. In short, we don’t need more tax legislation, we simply need all of us to pay their fair share under present laws. This has essentially no negative impact on the average honest citizen, but then we don’t have paid lobbyists greasing the palms of sleazy GOP legislators.

The tax gap also has meaningful implications for fiscal policy. These unpaid taxes mean policymakers must choose between rising deficits, lower spending on important priorities, or further tax increase to compensate for lost revenue—which will only be borne by compliant taxpayers. According to Charles Rettig, the Internal Revenue Service commissioner, The United States is now losing at least $1 trillion in unpaid taxes every year, Mr. Rettig further states that the agency lacks sufficient resources to catch tax cheats. Referring back to the beginning of this essay, that uncollected $1 trillion would essentially erase the annual deficit. Add to that allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices, which could save about $300 billion annually and the deficit is a memory.   

        Of course, the GOP doesn’t want to do the first, (rigorously enforce tax codes) because fat cat donors would have to pay their fair shares, or the second, because Pharma companies spend much more on advertising and lobbying than on research and development, thus their extortionate pricing. Want to reduce the pain on US consumers as well??  Void the Trump China tariffs, which in addition to supply chain issues are costing the average US household about $800 annually for a total of around $93 billion.

 Note: no social service or “people programs” were injured during the proposal of these measures.

Friday, January 20, 2023

Women

 

                                            Women

 

Several years ago, I chanced upon an essay written and posted to Facebook by an individual who styled herself as “Lila.” Her thesis was that the status of women as secondary to men was ordained by Heavenly guidance and any women who pursue careers outside the home or take issue with male dominance are somehow heretical and/or violating what she views as the “natural order” of things. At the time, I was focused predominately on national political issues or related subjects such as COVID and economics. I made some notes, but the issue languished until I recently  found the notes in my “documents” folder while searching for something else. After a review, I decided I was remiss in letting this one slide, so I’ll begin with my original opening sentence, which I wrote as the beginning of a brief response to the individual, whose actual, identity I do not know, and enlarge considerably on the subject continuing in that vein. If this sounds a bit like a history lesson that’s because it is. It’s what I do.        

 

Lila, this may well be the most well phrased and yet almost nonsensical defense of the deprecation of women I've ever read.

I must assume from your post that you are a Christian, which means that nothing related to how we treat others (some of which you include in your apologia) which derives from the Old Testament is valid anyway, since your boss described a “New Covenant”, consistent with his teachings and personal behavior as described in such of the synoptic gospels as we have traditionally been “allowed “ to read.

        The secondary status of women which evolved in early Christianity, and continues to a great extent in Evangelical settings, doesn’t stem from Jesus in any sense, but rather generally reflects the personal opinion of Paul; and even more so, the early Bishops who were, by the third century, creating a hierarchy (translates as "positions of authority and power") for themselves. As non-royalty, the only other option for a power-driven person in the Roman Empire was religion. This continued even into medieval Europe and later, where, typically, the eldest son inherited land and title and the second son entered the priesthood. If the family was "connected," he could become a bishop in no time at all.  As recently as 2022, twenty-five Church of England Bishops are still automatically granted seats in the House of Lords in the UK. There is only just very recently a proviso that one of the minor Bishops seats may be filled by a woman. Even a Methodist and a Chief Rabbi, (men only!) have been so seated. All this was cemented by the early systematic reduction of women to relatively inconsequential positions in the Church. Even those women who were sainted and were reverenced, had essentially no temporal authority over males.

Note: She ("Lila") then alleged that anyone who read the Bible with a different interpretation was “reading someone else’s mail.” As a cynic who is, nonetheless, more than passing familiar with the document in question, I decided to engage her on her own turf. 

Your claim that someone who sees the matter differently than you do is "reading someone else's mail" would seem to indicate that you believe that the Bible was written not for the world, but for select individuals (like you), not for anyone who can think critically. That’s just sad. It also implies than no one who is not already a believer could read the Bible and become one.  And finally, remember that the Bible you read isn't all the writings from the period which relate to Jesus.

The OT, of course, was not written contemporaneously, but as much as a thousand years after many of the described "events," so it is much less "history " than fable. Heck, even Homer was writing of events (The Trojan War) at a time much closer (within about 400 years) to the alleged events.

Likewise, the synoptic gospels were not written by the apostles who accompanied Jesus, since almost all of them (like Peter) were semi-literate. It is a sure bet that Peter never wrote in Greek, if at all. Additionally, some of the most powerful scenes in them (the synoptics) cannot possibly be even first-hand accounts such as Jesus' conversation in the wilderness with Satan, for which there is no witness, (yet there is verbatim dialogue!), or the scene in the garden where even with all the Apostles asleep, we again have verbatim dialogue between Jesus and God? Really? and who wrote that down? Paul, however, raised in a well to do family in a formerly Greek, later Roman city (Tarsus)  was schooled in Tarsus and later, Jerusalem, was well educated, and literate in Greek and used that skill to create the image of Jesus as he wanted the world to see it, yet he never met the man either (don’t give me that “Road to Damascus” bunk).

So, in summary, claiming to "know" what Jesus said, or even meant, was wishful thinking. Even if we assume that what is attributed to Jesus is what he actually taught, it was soon distorted into a different focus, from a personal religion to a “corporate” one. Every nation state (all of Europe) which made Christianity the state religion also derogated and relegated women to secondary status, while (exclusively male) Church primates quickly became advisors to kings.

The first step was to make the scriptures unavailable to the common person, who, being almost universally illiterate, were reliant upon the newly empowered, literate, clergy to read it and interpret it for them. (This would result in the Catholic Church continuing the Mass in Latin, understood by essentially no one not of the elite, from, at the latest, the 6th century, into the late 20th century (1965), when the first vernacular Mass was celebrated in Ireland.

By the late 200’s AD, most of the “traditional” Gospels which supported the new theme of a male dominated clergy and a secondary status for women, were accepted as such. Reasons for this are several. First off, converting Jews and Greeks, both of whose cultures subordinated women by religious credo, custom and tradition, was much easier if Christianity followed suit. Secondly and just as important was the opportunity for men, in societies already male dominated, to gain power without being born to it. This became even more obvious after Constantine's commission in 331 of fifty copies of the Bible for the Church at Constantinople. Now, endorsed by the Emperor, Christianity’s early power brokers had the highest authority to form the Bible as they desired, regardless of those “other books, which tell a slightly different story. At the Council of Hippo, held in north Africa in AD 393, a group of church leaders recognized a list of books that they believed to be scripture. They cherry picked those which fit their desired narrative.  

The "gospels” (Mary Magdalene, Timothy, Peter, Levi and around thirty other scriptural writings which didn't "make it" were rejected by that early Church council. What do they have in common? All differ from the “accepted” version as early church power brokers wanted it. More significant for the purposes of this discussion, several show the importance and equal status of Mary Magdalene as an apostle. Here is a snippet of the “Gospel of Mary” in the Nag Hammadi library (discovered near the Upper Egyptian town of Nag Hammadi in 1945.) :” “Levi answered and said to Peter, Peter you have always been hot tempered.  Now I see you contending against the woman like the adversaries. But if the Savior made her worthy, who are you indeed to reject her? Surely the Savior knows her very well.”  Why might Peter have acted as he did? Perhaps the “also non-included” Gospel of Philip is instructional. Here’s a verse or two: “And the companion of the [savior] was Mary Magdalene. He loved her more than all the disciples and used to kiss her often on her mouth. The rest of the disciples… [damaged text]. They said to him "Why do you love her more than all of us?" The Savior answered and said to them, "Why do I not love you like her? When a blind man and one who sees are both together in darkness, they are no different from one another. When the light comes, then he who sees will see the light, and he who is blind will remain in darkness." Apparently, in Jesus case, he liked what he saw! Apparently author Dan Brown did also, since this forms one of the principal premises of “The DaVinci Code,” condemned, naturally,  by The Roman  Catholic Church.

So, Lila, whomever or wherever you are, feel free to rationalize why you accept or condone the Far Right’s relegation of women and their right to control of their own bodies to the trash heap of religious dogma, but don’t claim it’s because the Jesus you claim to worship wanted it that way. It’s far more likely Josh Hawley, Mike Pence, or Matt Gaetz you’re thinking of.

Wednesday, December 14, 2022

Keystone XL One Last Time

 

                     XL One Last Time

                                                               

           I have previously written at some length about the reality of the Keystone XL pipeline vs the Fox News version. I have simply had it with those who, desperate to criticize the Biden re-cancellation of Keystone XL, blame it for current high gas prices. The project, which most Americans seem to think would initiate the piping of Alberta (Canada) tar sand oil across the United States, would, in fact, only be an addition to an already existing Keystone pipeline system which has been in operation across parts of the Midwest for years. The pipeline is owned by a Canadian company, TC Energy, and the Provincial Government of Alberta, Canada, yet, in its early construction stages several states allowed this Canadian entity to exert Eminent domain claims over US citizens to acquire right of way!

        The existing pipeline, three phases of it, runs east from Hardisty, Alberta, across Saskatchewan, across half of Manitoba, then drops almost straight down to Houston, Tx with a branch pipeline from Steele City Nebraska to southern Illinois. This system has been in operation since 2012, with the Neb.-Ill. branch coming online in 2016. It carries Tar sand oil (also known as bitumen), the dirtiest, costliest to refine,  crude petroleum product existing. The green line is the proposed XL, all the rest is in operation.

           

Unlike conventional crude oil, which occurs as a “pumpable” liquid within spaces in solid rock, oil sands are a mixture of semi-solid oil, sand, clay, and water. The viscous crude, called bitumen, can’t be pumped as it exists. Extraction methods use more energy and more water and are much more costly than conventional oil drilling. For deposits near the surface, the sand and oil mixture, also called “tar sands” must be   strip-mined, then processed with hot water and solvents to release the bitumen. For deeper deposits, steam is injected underground to allow the bitumen to flow into extraction wells. National Geographic has called exploiting oil sands the “world’s most destructive oil operation.”

The mining of bitumen laden tar sands strips away forest cover and topsoil, leaving acres of barren, black ground. The post-processing waste (“tailings”) are piped into large ponds, which then contain an acutely toxic mixture of water, sand, hydrocarbons, ammonia, acids, and heavy metals. Numerous scientific studies have detected toxins in the aquatic environment downstream from oil sands production, and a 2017 analysis estimated that cleanup costs will eventually exceed the value of oil sands royalties collected by the province of Alberta.

 The proposed XL would be larger and would greatly reduce the amount of pipeline in Canada (and the risk of spillage) by following the existing route south to the point where it currently turns due east, instead dropping south by southwest across Montana, South Dakota, and mid-Nebraska where it would join the current route. The real reason? Tar sand oil is heavy and sinks into the ground, can pollute the aquifer and is almost impossible to completely clean up. The existing Keystone lines already have the capacity to deliver 590,000 barrels per day to the Midwest refineries and 700,000 to the Texas coast. But the oil is expensive to extract and process, and it has a lower market value compared to U.S. crude oil. As of December of 2021, 300,000 of those barrels were simply “passing through” to be transferred daily to tankers at the port of Houston for export.

So why the XL? Simple, really. Canada would rather ship this dangerous pollutant through the US than through their own pristine middle provinces. In Canada, Keystone XL would barely graze southwestern Saskatchewan before dropping down into Montana, cutting off any new pipeline in either Manitoba or Saskatchewan.

So, what could go wrong? Well… TransCanada arbitrarily and improperly adjusted estimated spill factors to produce an estimate of one major spill on the 1,673 mi of pipeline about every five years, but federal data on the actual incidence of spills on comparable pipelines indicate a more likely average of almost two major spills per year. (The existing Keystone I pipeline had one major spill and eleven smaller spills in just its first year of operation.)" There were major concerns that a pipeline spill could threaten the Ogallala Aquifer, one of the world's largest freshwater reserves; the Ogallala Aquifer spans eight states, provides drinking water for two million people, and supports $20 billion in agriculture.

A University of Nebraska professor, John Stansbury, conducted an independent analysis which provides more detail on the potential risks for the Ogallala Aquifer. His conclusions? Stansbury concludes that the original safety assessments provided by TransCanada were intentionally misleading. His opinion?  "We can expect no fewer than two major spills per state during the 50-year projected lifetime of the pipeline. These spills could release as much as 180,000 barrels of oil each." Trans Canada also failed to factor in the fact that Portions of the XL pipeline would also cross an active seismic zone that had a 4.3-magnitude earthquake as recently as 2002. Oops!

So, what has actually happened so far on the existing Keystone system?

In 2016, about four hundred barrels (18,000 gallons) were released from the original Keystone pipe network via leaks, due to what was referred to as a "weld anomaly". Since all such welds should be radiographed, this casts TransCanada’s quality assurance processes in doubt. 

On November 17, 2017, the pipeline leaked around 9,600 barrels onto farmland near Amherst, South Dakota. The oil leak is the largest seen from the Keystone pipeline in the state. Investigators found that a metal tracked vehicle had run over the area, damaging the pipeline. An additional federal investigation found that 408,000 US gallons of crude had spilled at the site, which was about twice what TransCanada had reported. It was the seventh-largest onshore oil spill since 2002.

In April 2018, Reuters reviewed documents that showed that Keystone had "leaked substantially more oil, and more often, in the United States than the company indicated to regulators in risk assessments before operations began in 2010."

On October 31, 2019, a rupture occurred near Edinburg, North Dakota, spilling an estimated 9,120 barrels. Where the 45,000 US gallons that were not recovered from the 0.5-acre containment had spread, five acres were rendered essentially useless. This leak occurred while the South Dakota Water Management Board was in the middle of hearings on whether or not to allow TC Energy to use millions of gallons of water to build camps to house temporary construction workers for Keystone XL construction. Bad timing, huh?

On December 7, 2022, 4 days ago as I write this, TC Energy initiated a shutdown of the Keystone Pipeline System in response to an alarm signaling a loss in pressure. TC Energy later confirmed that there had been a release of oil into a creek located in Washington County, Kansas, twenty miles to the south of Steele City, Nebraska. About 588,000 gallons of tar sands crude was released. This leak was the largest in the United States in nearly a decade. Cleanup is ongoing but, being heavy, unrefined tar sand oil, it will likely never really be restored to former conditions.

                 Cleanup efforts in Kansas

So why not just continue the existing pipeline east to the Canadian east coast or build a new one across Canadian soil to the west coast, avoiding dealing with the US at all? TransCanada’s Energy East project had proposed to do exactly that, promising to carry 1.1 million barrels per day from Alberta to Canada’s east coast. But the plan was scrapped in 2017 amid strong opposition from indigenous communities, environmental advocates, and communities through which the pipeline would have passed (in other words, Canadians who didn’t want the possible environmental damage.) Going west, the Northern Gateway pipeline, proposed in 2008, would have taken the westward route, ending up in Kitimat, British Columbia. It would have cut almost 1400 miles off the current Keystone route. It was also killed for the same reason. “Why take a chance of polluting here when we can ship it south across the USA?”

So why not refine tar sand oil in Canada? Canada hasn’t built a new refinery in over 40 years, even though the Canadian   Communications, Energy and Paperworker’s Union estimates that 18,000 Canadian jobs are lost for every 400,000 barrels of bitumen that are exported. Why? It is expensive to build a refinery and only a specialized refinery can process bitumen and turn it into refined products such as fuels. Few refineries in Canada can do it. None of the refineries in eastern Canada can refine large quantities of bitumen. Not only does refining of tar sands significantly increase air pollution, but it also produces an especially dirty, carbon-intensive byproduct known as petroleum coke. Extracting bitumen from tar sands—and the refining of it into gasoline—is significantly costlier and more difficult than extracting and refining liquid oil. The Canadian position would seem to be, “Let someone else take the environmental risk, do the dirty work, and make the investment!”

The conclusion? As a risk/reward exercise Keystone XL is a loser for the US. Canada has more oil (175 billion barrels estimated) than anyone but the Saudis, but it is far dirtier. They currently produce more refined oil in their eastern refineries from what they import than they use, making them a net energy exporter. It is simply easier and cheaper for them to ship high risk, high sulfur, hard to refine, tar sand oil elsewhere, since the refining process is costly and a serious polluter.

 XL would have been a good deal for Canada and a bad one for the US, regardless of the misinformation to the contrary promulgated by those on the Far Right, whose primary objective is to attempt to discredit any decision which is even remotely environmentally based and Democratic in origin. The worst of these canards, as I said earlier, is the allegation that there is a gasoline shortage related to the cancellation of the Keystone XL. Its output, had it been built (and it would still be years from completion), would largely be sold overseas, profiting Canada, since we, the US, are still exporting oil, even now and US Energy company profits are at all-time highs.

Amen!

Saturday, December 10, 2022

Hot Topics

 

                                    Hot Topics

Today’s op-ed by Democrat turned Republican, turned idiot, Betsy McCaughey, leads with a headline which, as so many from the Right seem to do, implies that the Biden administration is specifically targeting and endangering employee 401K plans.

The headline, specifically written to strike fear into the hearts of anybody with any investments, says “President Joe Biden is going after 401K retirement accounts, risking millions of workers comfortable retirement funds; if you put money in a 401K, beware.” Reading just that, one might well believe that something disastrous and devious is happening in Washington when, in fact, the reverse is true. The Trump administration, catering to the anti-environment tenor of the Republican Party, enacted regulations which not only were aimed at discouraging 401K providers from including entities which invested in environmentally aimed products but actually stipulated that they could not unless they could guarantee that there would be a profit involved. In fact, no fund manager, no matter how brilliant, can guarantee that any investment will always make a profit. Market pressures don't care what fund managers think. No financial adviser can truthfully guarantee profit.

Employers have a legal duty to thoroughly assess funds’ risk and return when picking 401(k) plan investments; for example, they can’t subordinate the fiscal interests of workers in favor of a cause like climate change. The new rules don’t change these duties. What the Biden administration has done is to recommend removal of that Trump era restriction at the request of many financial product providers, employers, employees and at the recommendation of the Secretary of Labor. In essence, every 401K allows employees to choose how their contributions are invested in options provided. Under the Trump restriction some options were simply not available because they were environmentally and sustainability oriented and employees had no option to invest in that sector.

The way Ms. McCaughey puts it implies that The Biden administration is directing that fund providers must invest in companies that “follow left wing policies.” That verbiage, alone, tells you what her real agenda is. She then says, “It is legalized theft; the future return on your investment nest egg is being sacrificed to advance a woke agenda.” First off, the use of the word “woke” here is entirely inappropriate since the dictionary definition of woke mentions racial equality and has nothing to do with environmental activism. Giving Ms. McCaughey her due; she does understand “trigger words.”

Simply put, the Biden removal of the Trump directive is the very opposite of the veritable flood of Trump reversals of Obama policy for no reason other than personal spite. It mandates nothing, but simply allows more leeway for employees and employers to put their money in places the Trump gang didn’t like because it failed to fit their “ignore environmental issues” attitude.

Where, one wonders, was all this heartfelt Republican concern for American workers' financial security  in 2004 to 2008 when investment bankers were bundling incredibly high-risk mortgages and selling them to 401K providers and retirement fund managers as investment grade instruments? That massive failure of appropriate financial market regulation and the recession it precipitated is an indictment of everyone involved. What the Biden administration is seeking to do is simply to increase the options that employers and employees have for where they put their money. Period.

On an even more ridiculous note:

In case you missed it like I did, in late October, the national poster child for dumbass of the year, AKA Fox’s Tucker Carlson, proclaimed that, “The United States is "about to run out of diesel fuel ... by the Monday of Thanksgiving week." "Thanks to the Biden administration’s religious war (religious war??) in Ukraine, this country is about to run out of diesel fuel”, he said, continuing, "There will be no deliveries because there’ll be no trucks, there’ll be no diesel generators and then, invariably, our economy will crash because everything runs on diesel fuel, not on solar panels, not on wind farms — on diesel fuel."

Where to start with this lunatic? First off, not “everything” runs on diesel fuel. Electric power generation stations don't run on diesel fuel. Many trucks don't run on diesel fuel and even fewer cars run on diesel fuel. Having said that, it still would be a serious matter if we were going to run out of diesel fuel. The problem is that Carlson, like most of his Fox News cohort, makes a statement that he knows will scare the hell out of his gullible viewers, omitting the part that proves the statement is simply false. Carlson made his statement based on the amount of diesel fuel that was currently available which, if there wasn't any more diesel fuel made would only get us to about Thanksgiving Day. What he omitted is the fact that there were, at the same time, American refineries continuing to produce more diesel fuel and we continued importing fuel, ergo there was no shortage of diesel fuel, there was not going to be a shortage of diesel fuel and Tucker Carlson is simply a liar. Why would he say that? It was an obvious attempt to influence voters to vote “red.” Didn’t work all that well, huh?

And: 

I'm sure Star Parker means well. I'm sure she's a nice enough young woman. I'm also sure that she doesn't recognize that using religious grounds to define marriage means that she is guilty of the same the theocratically blind approach to government that she maligns in Afghanistan and other places in the world because their religion is different than hers. This is not the first time she has railed about the topic but the almost certain signing of a new federal law certifying that a marriage legally entered into anywhere, regardless of gender of the participants, is legal everywhere, seems to really offend her.

 Ms. Parker rejects the Respect for Marriage Act simply because it doesn't fit her religiously driven idea about what marriage is. Accordingly, she is absolutely free to marry as she sees fit. And now in America everybody else will be accorded the same privilege. When I look at the many ways in which dogmatic religious fervor has damaged humanity over the years it reaffirms the Jeffersonian belief that any established religion is a mistake in a national sense.

 I’m quite sure that MS Parker, a woman of color, is aware that only since 1924, and the USSC decision in Loving v Virginia, can she marry across racial lines, should she so choose. I am not so sure that she is aware that the hundreds of years of prohibition of such a union was largely derived from Christian religious dogma as well. Ms. Parker, as far too many do, seems to suffer from a common ailment, 1) the belief that freedom of religion is a good thing only if it is her religion and 2) Choosing who one loves is only allowed if she agrees with the choice.     

A knowledge of history, while it does tend to show marriage has traditionally been between men and women, also shows that the purpose of a formal marriage is, and has been, even in intensely religious societies such as the Puritans in Massachusetts, a legal procedure to ensure inheritance and property. Our founding fathers in Massachusetts had a civil ceremony which cemented those legal procedures and if they desired, as most of them did, they had a religious ceremony as well. Ms. Parker, in essence says, “What I believe is right and only what I believe can be right. How arrogant and short sighted that is.

And:

I subscribe to the online version of the Washington Post. Contrary to what those of the Right tend to feel, the Post carries op-ed commentary from both sides of the aisle. However, even when I differ with the writer, the columns are generally rancor free and use data to support arguments.

 Today, however there is an exception. The op-ed is headlined: “It’s time the Pentagon ended its Covid vaccine mandate for the military.”  I reflected a bit and couldn’t come up with a single idea that justified this position, so I read the column. The writer, a physician, takes the position that, since the Omicron variant is less affected by the current vaccines, there is no reason to give the shot. She then however acknowledges the development of a more potent one. She then also states that current Covid vaccines, especially the newer ones, both greatly reduce the severity if infected (as in greatly reduce the possibility of hospitalization) and also decrease transmissibility. In a military setting such as, oh I don’t know, maybe a submarine(?), any thing that reduces the likelihood of a crew becoming disabled and requiring hospitalization is a good thing, since hospitals are in short supply underwater, where I spent five years of my life, 90 days at a time.

Some facts: While civilians have the right to refuse vaccination and demonstrate their total lack of good judgement (and die if that is the result) military personnel don’t. Period. How odd is it that some, anti-vaxxers and Trumpists alike have chosen to be critics of mandatory vaccination even though the current Covid vaccines have been shown to be as safe or actually safer than most common vaccines? Could it be political? Of course it is, playing to the “You can’t tell me what to do” mindset of the Red Hat brigades. Well, Jethro, we can tell you what to do. We can make you have a driver’s license or walk. We can require you to have auto insurance. As of now, most civilians are not mandated to be vaccinated, but that doesn’t make it a bad idea.

Choosing to single out the military is far more nonsensical. Every new recruit already gets a slew of shots in basic training. These include measles, mumps, diphtheria, flubicillin, rubella and smallpox. It isn’t voluntary; it is a condition of employment, and the enlistee has signed a contract. If deployed, even in the Submarine Force where we were unlikely to ever contact most diseases, we also got periodic Pertussis, tetanus, Smallpox. (Every 10 years), Typhoid, Yellow fever, and Plague immunizations. They weren’t optional. We got these even if our likelihood of infection was exceptionally low, since any communicable disease can rapidly render a unit ineffective (think USS Theodore Roosevelt in 2020 - 1257 Covid cases, one death). Unfortunately, we still live in a world affected by a global pandemic. Covid is communicable and it is everywhere. Congressmen bitching about mandatory shots for the military are ones who have never served, or they’d know better. For a doctor to do so is even harder to grasp.

And finally, on a lighter note: Why do soccer players scream, writhe, and roll in agony on the ground when they fall, yet are able to hop back up and resume play when the ref fails to call a foul? An NFL wide receiver takes a bone shattering hit, gets up, looks at the guy who hit him and says, “That’s all you got?” I’m just sayin.’