New Rule #25: Stop whining about religious freedom,
when what you really want is the opportunity to practice religious oppression.
Well,
kids, it's Thursday again, which means that it is editorial column day in the
local Villages' "news"paper. Right wing sycophants Thomas Sowell and Mona Charen attack Presidential policy and all things
liberal per their usual political bent, but one columnist, Kathryn Lopez
reaches new heights of misdirection and
outright falsehood in a column entitled "Warren, God and the freedom to
choose." She quotes Rick Warren,
another of those mega church pastors whose cult of personality influences his
congregation to react to stimuli the way shoals of fish and flocks of birds all
seem to turn at the same time. "Can
we really talk about the state of our union without talking about the state of
our religious freedom?" Warren responded that religious freedom "(it)
is the freedom to practice my faith and values and the freedom to convert" She then writes, "He cautions against
the misreading of tolerance - mistakenly taking all ideas to be of equal value
an d dismissing the existence of truth." Of course, the "truth"
she refers to is far from that absolute. It is her perception and belief (note
the word belief) about the nature of God, the universe, morality, etc. Ms.
Lopez certainly is aware that more people in the world have other
"truths" that those who believe as she does. In dismissing other tenets,
credos and beliefs as being of lesser
value, she is diametrically opposed to Jefferson, Madison, Washington, and
others who had the foresight to endorse the intent and meaning of the First
Amendment. Washington in his letter to the Hebrew Congregation in Newport so eloquently wrote
"the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction,
to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its
protection should demean themselves as good citizens in giving it on all
occasions their effectual support."
Ms Lopez, a Catholic, has clearly decided that her "truth" is
exclusive. As to Mr. Warren's "freedom to convert" line, I would
posit that those of us who disagree with his personal "truth" should
be allowed to be free from his conversion
efforts.
I am
personally sick of the claims from the far right that religious freedom in
America is abridged by current law, when
in fact current legislative efforts protect freedom from the religiously driven prejudicial acts of the true believers among
us. This is manifested, when, for example, a pharmacist refuses to fill a
prescription for the "morning after" pill, citing personal beliefs as
the reason. The logic involved is ludicrous. His religious freedom is the freedom
to oppose abortion in his personal realm -
family, church, whatever. When , in the name of "truth" that
belief infringes on another's life, that isn't religious freedom, it's
religious oppression. The only difference between the pharmacist and a Talibani
believer who murders schoolgirls is in degree, not principal.
The
same is true of those who scream foul because their organization might be
forced, under new health care legislation to provide medical care to employees
which is inconsistent with their (the organization's) personal beliefs. The
rights in question here are those of the
person who has been prescribed (insert whatever drug here) which runs counter
to someone else's belief. The ridiculous principle now becomes that,
even though the Doctor has prescribed and the patient needs, someone
else gets to interpose their personal belief and say no. The lameness of this
argument is evident when listening to Catholics who are unable to articulate
any real statement in opposition except that the Church opposes birth control.
So what? So don't use birth control in your personal life. In like manner,
don't keep it from a non-Catholic employee.
It's
really as simple as that. Those who would impose their beliefs on others, feel
justified in doing so because theirs is the "real and only" truth.
All others are lesser persons until converted. I reiterate, in far too many
instances the only difference between aggressive evangelicals and the Taliban
is headwear and the language they speak.
No comments:
Post a Comment