hy·poc·ri·sy (/hiˈpäkrisē/)
Noun
|
During the
last presidential campaign, Willard M. Romney castigated Democrats in general
and Barack Obama in particular, for the (Dem.) platform's omission of language
specifically supporting Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Romney
also accused the President of throwing
Israel “under the bus", while former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty said Obama
had made a “mistaken and very dangerous demand.” How soon we forget! Both parties have, through the years,
generally held much the same positions on Israel, that it is up to Israel and
the Palestinians to decide Jerusalem's final status, essentially a neutral
position.
Imagine, if
you will, Republican reaction to the President saying this: "The other party's position (platform
language declaring Jerusalem Israel's capital) is dishonest." "To make Jerusalem
the capital of Israel is not the platform of a major American political party,
that is what I find so revolting here."
Or try this, the Secretary of State, reviewing the opposition party's
policy on Israel says, "Then all out on Israel, I mean in a really
nauseating way...in a degree of detail you know, Jerusalem should be the
capital, direct negotiations between the parties, nauseating detail. I mean,
this is a disgrace, this was written by a bunch of cynical amateurs." Then imagine then President responding,
" To be all out on Israel - isn't that something though? that is so
dishonest. Well, it shows you what we have to contend with, and it also shows the
necessity for us to be in good shape, because these people (the other party)
are so revolting that they have to be smashed!"
Well, boys
and girls, the above conversation did take place; not between President Barack Obama and Hilary
Clinton or John Kerry or any other Democrat. Although Republicans, desperately
split on many issues, are grasping at the Israel issue to castigate the President,
they would do well to recall their own party's leaders, and the positions they
established for their party.
Richard Nixon
and SecState Henry Kissinger (himself Jewish) had the above conversation in the oval office in June of
1972. Once again Nixon's taping system,
installed and upgraded to "preserve his legacy" does much more to
reveal the man's inner mental pathology. Along the way, it also reveals the pathetic specter
of Henry Kissinger, whom Nixon referred to as his "Jew Boy" (again
those damned tapes) fawning over a borderline sociopath who cared little for
the man, but needed his imprimatur on foreign policy.
Bless their hearts.
No comments:
Post a Comment