Went to the supermarket this morning to get something we
really needed - toilet tissue. The store was jammed with shoppers who apparently had never thought about storm supplies until a Cat 5 hurricane jogged their interest.
It was almost amusing seeing the frustration of those who
came to buy what their kitchen tap dispenses almost for free, when they were
greeted by the "out of water" sign. Apparently it has never occurred
to them to simply buy plastic containers in the 2 or 3 gallon size and fill
them. The water simply will not spoil....ever. I know of one person who has a
spa who was worried about having enough water to flush the john. Our small spa
is 250 gallons, which will get rid of a lot of "stuff."
In the midst of
this I was reminded of another horrific John Stossel column, this one from Sunday,
September 3rd entitled "Price Increases After Storms Serve Purpose." After seeing the
title, I simply couldn't help myself. I had to see what the brain damaged "free
market" whore had written this time.
First he derided Texas Attorney General Ken
Paxton for decrying "price gouging"
during Hurricane Harvey. Yes, that's what I said; he was critical of Paxton's opinion that price gouging during a crisis is immoral. The examples cited by the
AG included a case of water raised to $99,
and $5 dollar per gallon gas.
Stossel, on the other hand thinks these are good things.
Here is the moron in his own words, "Prices should rise during
emergencies. Price changes save lives. That's because prices aren't just money
- they are information."
Stossel, ever the apostle of Adam Smith's 250 year old and
very simplistic economic theory, goes on to say that raising prices keeps the
first customers from buying out supplies and leaves more for others. He
continues with, "But if the store owner can charge $99 per case for water,
you will buy less water and other customers will get what they need." He
finishes with reminding us that it's simple supply and demand, and we should
love it.
And you know
what? Stossel is correct in his
assertions with one logical hole through which the Spruce Goose could fly (if it
weren't in a museum on Oregon): This statement is true for a steady state
economy with normal fluctuations in both sides of the equation. Equating normal
market operations with conditions such as the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Harvey
in Houston and environs is criminally stupid. It also holds up Stossel up for
what he is, the Rush Limbaugh of economics.
In an emergency situation, and with a life
critical resource such as water, persons like Stossel will always be ok,
they're rich. He doesn't care about $99 per case water for two reasons. First,
he can afford it no matter the cost and second, he doesn't live in a flooded
neighborhood with no water supply and no income. Stossel has no empathetic
connection with the paycheck to paycheck worker for whom a "spare"
$99 for a case of water is a pipe dream. He also has demonstrated, in previous
op-ed drivel, that he has no concern for them. His rants on free market health care have
shown this to be the case numerous times. The economic and survival plights of victims of Harvey are, seemingly,
of no interest to Stossel, as long as those capitalists for whom he shamelessly shills can make an even bigger
buck out of the misfortunes of the disadvantaged.
Water on the shelves was
already priced so that both bottler and distributor could fulfill the stated
goal of the modern corporation: make a good return for shareholders. In "Stossel World" this would be
facilitated even further by the total absence of more modern regulations, incepted to insure we don't return to the bad old days
of Morgan, Rockefeller and Gould, monopolists, market conspirators and
accumulators of fortunes built on usurious business practices in the free for
all, "screw the consumer" America of the late 1800s. Stossel's repetitious,
"unregulated free market"
theme reminds me of the post WWI Gus
Kahn and Richard Whiting song with the
verse, "There's nothing surer, the rich get rich and the poor get poorer.
In the mean time, in between times, ain't we got fun.?"
No, not if we're in Houston
and playing by Stossel rules, "we ain't."
No comments:
Post a Comment