Dr. Stella Immanuel is a self-described "wealth
transfer coach", and has authored several books as part of her Occupying
Force series. She has been an outspoken supporter of Donald Trump, and
long-time critic of "unmarried couples living together, homosexuality,
bestiality, polygamy" and so-called "homosexual terrorism".
Sadly, for the gullible, Immanuel's medical claims are
sometimes combined with her spiritual beliefs. She has said that many
gynecological illnesses are the result of having sex dreams with succubi and
incubi (male and female demons) and receiving "demon sperm". She has
said that endometriosis, infertility, miscarriages, and sexually transmitted
infections are caused by these spirit husbands and spirit wives. According to
Immanuel, the causes of cysts and endometriosis are individuals having sex in
their dreams with demons and witches. She said in a 2015 sermon that space
alien DNA is used in medical treatments and that reptilians and aliens run the
government. She also stated in 2015 that Illuminati are using witches to
destroy the world through abortion, gay marriage, children's toys and media such
as Harry Potter, Pokémon, Wizards of Waverly Place and Hannah Montana. In
another 2015 sermon, she said scientists are developing vaccines to stop people
from being religious. In layman’s terms this bag of misinformation and superstitious
drivel is as loony as a shit house mouse and about as rational as Michele Bachmann
on meth.
Tragically,
some who deny Global Warming in the face of real-world data and contiguous evidence
(chains of related events), will believe this off the wall Cameroonian nutter.
Real scientists, in multiple studies, have debunked her claims related to any
real effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine as a “cure” for Covid 19. Of course,
Trump, himself the poster child for the reality challenged, is a believer. As
Ron White famously stated: “You can’t fix stupid.”
There is another,
far more Karmic, pattern being seen as relates to severity and in fact susceptibility
to Covid 19 and that is a Mayo clinic and Harvard study which seems to verify earlier studies from Europe which go a
long way to explaining the seemingly much lower susceptibility to and severity of
the infection in some younger persons. The study, not yet peer reviewed, as it was just completed, is entitled " Exploratory analysis of immunization records highlights decreased
SARS-CoV-2 rates in individuals with recent non-COVID-19 vaccinations" and can be found in its entirety here:
https://www.medrxiv.org/…/10…/2020.07.27.20161976v1.full.pdf
It revolves around other anti-viral anti-bodies present in these populations because of ….wait for it…..MMR vaccinations and several other related vaccines (Hep A & B, Flu, Pneumonia and several others). Areas where MMR is a routine vaccination from around the world report lower incidence of infection and less severe courses of disease in young persons into early adulthood. If you want the technical explanation, here it is as brief as it can be and still be understandable:
SARS-CoV-2 rates in individuals with recent non-COVID-19 vaccinations" and can be found in its entirety here:
https://www.medrxiv.org/…/10…/2020.07.27.20161976v1.full.pdf
It revolves around other anti-viral anti-bodies present in these populations because of ….wait for it…..MMR vaccinations and several other related vaccines (Hep A & B, Flu, Pneumonia and several others). Areas where MMR is a routine vaccination from around the world report lower incidence of infection and less severe courses of disease in young persons into early adulthood. If you want the technical explanation, here it is as brief as it can be and still be understandable:
“The ability of live attenuated vaccines to
train the immune system against non-targeted pathogens (ed: in this case
Covid-19) by training the host system against a variety of infections is a key
feature of this approach. Evidence of its efficacy is growing. Traditional
vaccines seek to activate the adaptive immune system by causing the T- and
B-lymphocytes to recognize specific pathogen. Then when a similar pathogen is
encountered later, the adaptive immune system will remember that pathogen and
launch a defense.
The innate immune system works differently. It recognizes a pathogen
through a system of pattern recognition receptors that quickly activate the
host defense. The innate immune system does not, however, possess immunologic
memory. During the past several years, clinical trials have shown that the
innate immune cells – monocytes, macrophages and NK cells, for example – can
confer protection from certain infections independently of the lymphocytes.
Notably, this system provides nonspecific protection against infections
unrelated to the target pathogen of the particular vaccine.
As an example, MMR vaccinations are given to all U.S. Navy recruits; researchers pointed out. The markedly milder symptoms seen in the 955 sailors
on the USS Roosevelt who tested positive for COVID-19 (with only one
hospitalization), are a real-world illustration of this effect. (This also is
in light of a crew of 3,532 in close contact during the viral latency period
with only 27% becoming symptomatic!)
Additional data noted a correlation between people in
geographical locations who routinely receive the MMR vaccine and reduced
COVID-19 death rates. Research shows that countries with recent vaccination
campaigns against measles-rubella have fewer COVID-19 deaths.
There is a further correlation between those
born after about 1971, when MMR vaccination became widespread, and low
incidence of COVID-19. Hong Kong, for example, had 1,128 cases as of June 19,
and 1,074 who had recovered from COVID-19. Only four people died. That’s a
fatality rate of 0.4% in a population of 7.5 million. To date the US death rate
is almost 10 times as high as Hong Kong, one of the most densely populated places
in the world, at over 17,000 per square mile. The reason for such a low
incidence rate may be the free MMR vaccination program instituted in 2019, for
all adult healthcare workers, airport staff and foreign domestic helpers, and
the 1997 mass immunization campaign for people from infancy to age 19.
I said at the
outset that this was Karmic. By that I meant that those anti-vaxxers who, citing
completely discredited hysteria regarding vaccines, refuse to give their offspring
protection against common childhood diseases which can be fatal, may also have
placed them at much greater risk of Covid 19.
California mandates full vaccination panels prior to entering
childcare or school. Of almost 40,000 cases in the age 0 to 17 range, there have
been zero deaths. The age 18-34 group (residual MMR effects ?) has by far the
lowest percentage of deaths of the rest. The next age group - 35 to 49 - has over
four times as many deaths. This is consistent with the general belief among
immunologists that the effects of MMR last, in general, about 20 years. Very few
adults ever get a “booster.”
Now for my editorial opinion vice data: (well ok, some
data)
As previously
stated, California mandates MMR. Period. No personal or religious exemptions allowed
for public school children. Its neighbor to the north, Oregon allows exemption
from any and all vaccines, simply on an “I don’t wanna” basis. No reason or
certificate required. Unsurprisingly, Oregon is a hotbed of the anti-vaxx
movement and sentiment. Rates of
unvaccinated children for “philosophical” reasons in Oregon have been on the
rise since 2015. In fact, as ludicrous as it seems to the rational mind,
considering measles can, and did at one time, kill children, 7.5 percent of
children in kindergarten in Oregon are currently not vaccinated with one or
more shots because of a nonmedical exemption. Consequently, Oregon
has had three measles outbreaks in recent years. So, would we expect Oregon to also
have a higher rate of Covid infection among younger groups if all the above is
realistic? The data below is from the Lagrande (Oregon) Observer:
“The number of COVID-19 cases in the state of Oregon doubled
during the month of June, and the population of Oregonians accounting for the
majority of the increase in COVID-19 cases in the last month was younger, an
analysis of the data from Oregon Health Authority finds.
Ages 0-9 saw a 391% increase (65 on May 31, 254 new cases in
June), and 10-19 jumped 258% (179 on May 31, 462 new cases in June).”
For comparison,
California (mandatory vax) had just 1.9% in the 1 to 5 age range (less than half
or Oregon’s 4% figure) and 7% in the 5-17 age group (30% lower than Oregon).
Oregon has a far lower population density, yet still manages to have more sick
kids on a percentage basis. Why? I think we know why. The sole relevant
variable is MMR vaccination.
Beware the law of unintended consequences!
No comments:
Post a Comment