FaceBook To and Fro
A friend posted a (truthful) statement regarding the fact that
we, as a nation, accomplished more when the highest marginal tax rates were
much higher. Another responded with, “So you don’t believe in the Laffer curve?”
as a memory jogger, the Laffer Curve was a visual representation of “supply side”
economic theory. It was overly simplistic and proven by Reagan to fail, even
his eventual VP (GHW Bush) called it “VooDoo economics” while still a
Presidential candidate.
I responded:
“XXX, you say "believe in" as if it were the
Easter bunny. Actually, it's more like the tooth fairy. Even Reagan's
"handlers" tried to have economists like Dr Pierre Renfret, and
others, "talk him out of it." There is a modern analogy here: Essentially
every legitimate economist in the US thought (and still thinks) Trump's tariffs
were a bad idea. Like Reagan he refused to listen. Like Reagan, people are
getting hurt (remember the Reagan recession, followed by increasing deficits?).
As of now, the Trump tariffs have cost
an additional $32 billion annually in increased farm subsidies. Meanwhile
Brazil is delighted to supply China with soybeans at a lower price. Add to that
the extra cost to every US household of the tariffs paid on Chinese imports.
If
you ever needed convincing that Trump is moron, consider the statement that
"China will pay the tariffs!" Any high school economics student knows
that is bullshit. The importer always pays, and always adds the cost to the
retail price. independent studies show that the cost per household of the Trump
tariffs has added a total of about $850 X 128 million households annually. For
the math challenged that's another $109 billion annually. Adding the increased
tariff cost to the increased farm subsidy cost gives us $141 billion. Of course,
we just add it to the deficit, right? In 2017, these ill-advised tariffs costs
constituted 21% of the entire federal deficit!
Then go back to the 8 consecutive single digit or zero
deficit years under Eisenhower when the highest marginal tax rate was 91%. The
Laffer curve is an opinion, which by the way has NEVER been shown in actual
practice to be valid over time. On the other hand, however, tracking the
Federal deficit overtime, (you know actual historical fact?) shows that higher
marginal taxes and lower deficits generally go hand in hand. It isn't hard and
fast, because economics is the softest of soft sciences, but the data is there.
This was a response to a Trumper who cited the “several thousands”
as real numbers for Covid deaths.
“No, XXX, to minimize the reality of CoVid, they simply stopped
considering a death from a subsequent or related cause as a Covid death.
Chadwick Bosman, lamentably, died from multiple organ failure, but I guarantee
the death certificate says “colon cancer.” Similarly, many cancer deaths are
from kidney failure, never listed as "renal failure" but as cancer. In
like manner,
those who die from
flu frequently die from pneumonia as a result of contracting the flu. Covid is
similar, in that like SARS, avian flu, H1N1, etc, the lungs are a significant
target. 8% of all Covid deaths are considered to be from pneumonia/respiratory
failure, that figure, alone, is 486,281!
Add in those with compromised
respiratory systems like those with COPD and it's larger. In fact, those with
COPD who contract Covid have a 63% chance of severe illness and 60% of those
will die. Add in those with coronary issues which are pushed to death by Covid,
and the numbers expand significantly. One last example, some, especially the
young, who die after contracting flu, die due to co-infection with another
germ, usually bacteria such as strep; or aggravation of existing conditions
such as heart disease and asthma. They still call these "flu deaths".
Mark Twain famously said, “There are three types of lies – lies, damned lies, and
statistics.” If I wanted to minimize the public's concern, I might tell the
7500 death lie, which is both a “fudged” statistic and a damned lie. That's
what it is, a “twofer” of prevarication.
Johns Hopkins has done the most comprehensive data
collection ever done to study a disease and its effects world-wide. I tend to
believe them more than a politically motivated misleading number mill.
And, finally, a Trumpite concurred with his deity that he
had, in fact, “kept all his promises” a
claim he reiterated in the RNC ballyhoo several times. I thought it might be “fun”
to check some of the more ludicrous ones.
“Who else could take 16 vacations, play over 100 rounds of
golf and hold over 300 fundraisers while serving as POTUS besides
@BarackObama?” (Trump campaign tweet)
"I love golf, but if I were in the White House, I
don't think I'd ever see Turnberry again," he said in February 2016,
referring to the famous course he owns in Scotland. "I don't think I'd
ever see Doral again," he added, referring to the famous course he owns in
Miami. "I don't ever think I'd see anything — I just want to stay in the
White House and work my ass off, make great deals, right? Who's gonna
leave?" (interview NBC, August 2016)
As it happened, Trump, that’s who’s gonna leave …a lot!
Bearing in mind
that Trump complained about 8 years of Obama golf and vacations and comparing
the two, week for week, at the 160-week point:
160 weeks: Obama golf outings 82, Trump 200
Where: Trump: only private clubs, flying to most of them
Obama: 62%
military courses (drive to many of them,) 20% private, 18% public.
Days Trump has spent at Mar a Lago: 127
Cost of flights to Mar a Lago (30 so far): over $59,110,000
Days Trump has spent at Bedminster (NJ): 75
Cost of flights to Bedminster (23 so far): $18,375,500
Trump has visited his clubs once every 4.7 days since his
inauguration! Projected visits to golf clubs in four years: 314
Projected visits in eight years: 628
Vacations: Obama 16 total (8 years), Trump 27 (3.3 years)
“China is
paying the tariffs.”:
The cost of the
tariff comes directly out of the bank account of an American importer when the
good arrives at the port. As of the end of 2019, US companies have paid $46
billion more in tariffs than they would have without Trump's tariffs. Guess who
they passed it on to?
We're
not a rich country. We're a debtor nation...We've got to get rid of the $19
trillion in debt," "I think I could do it fairly quickly...I would
say over a period of eight years." (Trump said this to a The
Washington Post reporter in April 2016)
This statement
alone should have been the wake-up call to any and all who still considered him
a savvy businessman. Sadly, the deplorables neither understood it nor cared to
learn. The reality is that, three years into his presidency, the deficit is 68
percent higher than when he started, and this excludes the effects of Covid. Deficit “hawk,” Trump, has since run deficits
of 3.4%, 3.8%, 4.6%, and 4.8%, with 2021 projected at 4.1% of GNP (that was pre
Covid which, alone, will add an estimated $3.7 Trillion to the deficit.) All
these have been incurred with what Trump touts as “The strongest economy ever.”
There is an explanation. Trump has a cavalier attitude about the nation’s debt
load similar to his corporate debt. During the campaign, he actually said the
nation could "borrow, knowing that if the economy crashed, you could make
a deal.”
Let’s make that deal Mr. Trump. Get the fuck out.
Just go away.
No comments:
Post a Comment