The Myth of the Overcrowded Sky
When Charlie Kirk declared “We’re
full. No more visas for Indians,” it wasn’t a policy proposal—it was a bumper
sticker masquerading as a worldview. In a nation built on immigration,
innovation, and the occasional in-flight pretzel, Kirk’s remarks land with all
the grace of a goose in a jet engine.
Let’s be clear: the U.S. aviation
industry isn’t being overrun by foreign pilots. It’s being held aloft by them. Indian
American professionals make up a vital part of our tech, healthcare, and yes,
aviation sectors. They don’t displace American workers—they keep the planes
flying, the code compiling, and the hospitals running while certain pundits are
busy fearmongering from the comfort of a podcast studio.
Kirk’s comments weren’t just
xenophobic—they’re economically illiterate. The H-1B visa program exists
because there’s a shortage of qualified workers in key industries. If we’re
“full,” it’s only of bad takes and empty slogans.
And let’s examine safety. The FAA
doesn’t track pilot crashes by race or nationality because it’s irrelevant to
performance. What do they track? Training hours, fatigue, mechanical issues,
and weather. You know—actual safety factors? The idea that demographic
diversity compromises safety isn’t just wrong, it’s dangerous. It undermines
trust in a system that’s statistically safer than driving to the airport.
But, of course Kirk’s worldview didn’t
stop at borders—it extended to bedrooms and boardrooms. At a women’s
conference, he advised young women to avoid careers like orthopedic surgery,
suggesting they should prioritize marriage and children instead. His claim that
“all the good ones are gone” if women don’t settle down early wasn’t just
regressive—it was a throwback to the kind of gender norms that make Donald
Trump and Brigham Young seem progressive.
This wasn’t just rhetoric—it was ideology. It limns diversity
as a threat, ambition as a flaw, and equality as a zero-sum game. It’s the kind
of worldview that fears a cockpit staffed by a Black man or woman more than it fears
turbulence.
So, what was really behind the “we’re full” and “stay home,
ladies” messaging? In truth, a fear of change and a fear of complexity. A fear
that the world is bigger than one ideology can contain.
If Kirk wanted to fly in a plane
staffed only by people who looked and thought like him, he was welcome to
charter one. The rest of us will be boarding commercial flights piloted by
professionals—regardless of where they were born or what gender they
are—because we care more about credentials than chromosomes.
No comments:
Post a Comment