Rather than publish all this in FaceBook, where the conversation began, I'll just post the link to this. The issue is one person's insistance that our nstion's founders were all religious and "separation" didn't really mean what it has come to mean. several of these, especially Madison (author of much of the Constitution, leave little doubt that that is precisely what he, at least, meant.
John Adams
"The United States of America have exhibited, perhaps, the
first example of governments erected on the simple principles of nature; and if
men are now sufficiently enlightened to disabuse themselves of artifice,
imposture, hypocrisy, and superstition, they will consider this event as an era
in their history. Although the detail of the formation of the American
governments is at present little known or regarded either in Europe or in
America, it may hereafter become an object of curiosity. It will never be pretended
that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were
in any degree under the influence of Heaven, more than those at work
upon ships or houses, or laboring in merchandise or agriculture; it will
forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use
of reason and the senses."
"Indeed, Mr. Jefferson, what could be invented to debase the
ancient Christianism which Greeks, Romans, Hebrews and Christian factions,
above all the Catholics, have not fraudulently imposed upon the public?
Miracles after miracles have rolled down in torrents."
letter to Thomas Jefferson
Thomas Jefferson:
"Say nothing of my religion. It is known to my god and myself
alone." (The lower case "G" is Jefferson's)
[N]o man shall be compelled to frequent or support any
religious worship, (school?) place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced,
restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise
suffer, on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall
be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of
religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their
civil capacities.
James Madison:
"Every new & successful example of a perfect separation
between ecclesiastical and civil matters is of importance."
"The civil government ... functions with complete success ...
by the total separation of the Church from the State."
Is the appointment of Chaplains to the two Houses of
Congress consistent with the Constitution, and with the pure principle of
religious freedom? In strictness the answer on both points must be in the negative.
The Constitution of the U S forbids everything like an establishment of a
national religion. The law appointing Chaplains establishes a religious worship
for the national representatives, to be performed by Ministers of religion,
elected by a majority of them, and these are to be paid out of the national
taxes. Does this not involve the principle of a national establishment...?
Benjamin Franklin
"I have found Christian dogma unintelligible. Early in life I
absented myself from Christian assemblies." -- Benjamin Franklin
George Washington
"I know that Gouverneur Morris, who claimed to be in
his secrets, and believed himself to be so, has often told me that General
Washington believed no more in that system [Christianity] than he did."
-- Thomas Jefferson, in his private journal, February, 1800,
"Unlike Thomas Jefferson -- and Thomas Paine, for that
matter -- Washington never even got around to recording his belief that Christ
was even a great ethical teacher. His reticence on the subject was truly
remarkable. Washington frequently alluded to Providence in his private
correspondence. But the name of Christ, in any correspondence whatsoever, does
not appear anywhere in his many letters to friends and associates throughout
his life."
-- Paul F Boller, George Washington & Religion (1963)
No comments:
Post a Comment