Monday, yet again.
Good Morning America, as always, provided ample subject
matter for the first rant of the week.
Let's start with the phoniest. A new Trump commercial has daughter Ivana,
shilling for her father. Apparently oblivious to the train wrecks of her
father's three marriages and numerous adulterous dalliances, she attempts to portray him as a gentle man
concerned with family and in tune with "working class values," whatever in the world they may be. Of the
several things Trump promises, the bulk are issues that progressives have lobbied for
over the years only to be thwarted by GOP resistance, such as guaranteed maternity
leave, etc. The one which stood out to me was the proposal to allow "Child
care savings accounts" for parents.
Most families
with two working parents already pay childcare expenses directly, if they can
afford to, and for those with more limited means the term "savings
account" is a foreign term, whether for child care, medical expense or
general savings, such as retirement. This sop, proffered to the working poor is
meaningless in reality. But then, as I reflect, so is the entire Trump
campaign.
Medical savings
accounts and child care savings accounts are only of use if a family can afford to save.
Latest figures show that the "average" American saves less than 4% of their income annually. The problem with that is that it is
derived from averaging the destitute with the fabulously wealthy. In truth, the
lowest third of Americans save zero per cent annually! This same third will have no retirement savings
whatsoever. An equally sobering statistic reveals that the average American
family has only about $5,000 saved for retirement at age 65! You want to make this better? The hell with child care savings accounts -
provide it free. Do the same with universal health care. Oh never mind; Big
Pharma would never allow that to happen.
Another emerging
issue was Ginger Zee's weather report detailing the impending impact of
Hurricane Matthew in Haiti, followed by Robin Robert's (accurate) statement
regarding the thousands of Haitians still living in makeshift tent cities as a
result of the earthquake of 2010. What
is as troubling in some ways as the continued human suffering as a result of the quake itself, is
the deceptive efforts of the American
Red Cross to portray themselves as great humanitarians who simply need more
money to do their good works.
When the devastating earthquake leveled Haiti in 2010,
millions of people donated to the American Red Cross. The charity raised almost
half a billion dollars. It was one of its most successful fundraising efforts
ever. The problem is that in the face of claims to have provided far more permanent residences than are to be found
there today, the Red Cross says it has provided homes to more than 130,000
people, but the number of permanent homes the charity has built is six. I
reiterate - 6! Meanwhile temporary housing facilities with an planned three
year lifespan are, predictably, 6 years out - failing. Where did the money go?
It's extremely hard to tell, largely due to Red Cross obfuscation and general unwillingness
to open the books. What is known however, is that as much as a third or more of
the funds were diverted to "administrative" costs, including generous
compensation to expatriate Haitians hired to "coordinate" on the
ground.
According to an
internal Red Cross budgeting document for the project in Campeche, the project
manager — a position reserved for an expatriate – was entitled to allowances
for housing, food and other expenses, home leave trips, R&R four times a
year, and relocation expenses. In all, including salary, it added up to
$140,000.
The American
Red Cross has a rating of 3 of 4 stars, largely based on average financial
transparency, which includes detailing what percentage of funds collected
actually goes to Program needs. Organizations like Doctors Without Borders,
United Methodist Committee on relief, The Clinton Foundation, Direct Aid International and others are more
highly rated and far more financially transparent.
And, just
because it's election season, the Trump Foundation, while not rated by Charity Navigator, based solely on what I can prove that they donated to, has done much
worse than most "charities" in America. Another Post report earlier this week claimed
Trump spent $258,000 from his foundation to settle lawsuits that involved his
businesses – an apparent violation of laws against “self-dealing,” which
prohibit nonprofit leaders from using charity money to benefit themselves.
Of course, the
Trump Foundation has adopted a very charitable definition
for its charitable giving, which included a $25,000 campaign donation to
Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi just four days before her office decided not
to participate in a lawsuit against Trump University, two portraits of Trump,
and a signed Manning football helmet. In
2010, the Trump Foundation gave $10,000 to Jenny McCarthy’s Generation Rescue,
a nonprofit group whose primary goal is to promote false links between
vaccinations and autism.
Next up, a
short piece on developments in the fight against breast cancer. This is a
worthy cause, but what left me curious was the lead in to the article trumpeting
that the expert weighing in would be "Angelina Jolie's breast cancer
doctor." Now, I'm relatively sure
that he's a pretty good specialist, but
is it the fact that he's experienced with a star's mammaries that makes him
newsworthy? Would he be any less
credible if he was merely a cutting edge medical researcher than boob fondler
to the stars?
And, finally,
how stupid does one have to be to take $10 million in diamonds on vacation?
Apparently the poster child for "big butt, empty head" - Kim Kardashian-West
did just this for a trip to Paris. Unfortunately the five masked robbers who took
the jewelry, and held her at gunpoint while doing so, knew just precisely how
stupid one would have to be and correctly decided she was "that stupid."
Never fear, hubby Kanye left in the
middle of a concert in the US, hopped a
plane to Paris, but apparently the
robbers had decided that 7 hours was just too f*****g long to wait to hear what
would surely be just another mindless rant from the self proclaimed master of
the genre.
No comments:
Post a Comment