Sunday, March 18, 2018

No one is entitled to their own facts.


        A letter in Today’s newspaper is so rife with outright falsehoods that space in my return allowed addressing only the worst, due to the 300-word limit. Rather than redo what was said in the original I’ll just add a bit in each short response paragraph. The topics will be obvious.

       Members of Congress have exactly the same medical insurance options as Villagers, by law.  (the letter decried their “private insurance plans” which is ludicrous, since we are backward and still believe health insurance should be profitable, instead of a citizen’s right.)  Like every insurance program in America except Medicare and Medicaid, those options are either individual or group plans. Many use the government employees plan, others use vehicles like Cigna, but none is free. 

       Likewise, there is no secret “Congressional” ward at Walter Reed where members get free health care. In fact, if a member becomes critically ill and is transported to Reed, their health care plan will be billed. No American is “told what insurance to buy”, except that insurers must meet coverage standards.

        No Congressman has, or has ever had, a “lifetime salary.” They have a retirement program which is OK but less than most executives of mid-sized or large companies. A two-term Representative failing to get a third term gets no retirement at all, since vesting requires five years’ service.

      To put this into perspective, a three term Congressman who loses his seat is "vested" and can draw retirement, but only at age 62, at which time his retirement would be 12.5% of his high three salary years. If you were elected in 2006 at age 36 to the House and were defeated in 2012, you wait 20 years to draw any retirement benefit, and then it would be 12.5% of $174,000, or $21,759. Not bad, but...a Navy Commander, (even if he was Supply Corps or JAG office and had never even gone to sea) retiring at 42 after 20 years would earn a minimum of $50,000 annually and would have been paid over $1 million dollars in retirement by age 62, at which time he also would draw Social Security.

        Lest you think this is a military phenomenon, let's look at a civilian 20-year career: firefighter. The average 20-year NYFD retiree earns in retirement just under $100k annually! NYPD is similar. Obviously, firefighters, law enforcement personnel and the military risk their lives while employed, but this is about retirement compensation, not active duty salary. That's what hazardous duty supplements are for. By comparison, Congress does fairly well, but not nearly as well as the lie portrays!

        The vast majority of immigrants, legal or undocumented, work, many below minimum wage. In many cases they do jobs which other citizens won’t do. The statement in the letter is simply false. Immigrants can’t “demand benefits,” because they are prohibited from welfare. Can’t get it. Nope.

Barack Obama provided a “real” birth certificate. Period.

The decision in the Uranium One instance was the unanimous decision of a 16 agency committee, of which Mrs. Clinton was one vote. Apparently, Mrs. Clinton intimidated the other 15 members, which included secretaries of Treasury (he chaired), Energy, Defense, and others. By the way, all these persons were confirmed by a Republican controlled Senate! The rest of the story, untold by Trumpists and others because it proves the lie to their rants, is that the US buys (and, historically, has bought) most of its Uranium from others who mine it in our own western states in the first place, and since neither Uranium One or Rosatom holds an export license, whatever they extract can’t be exported. Sorry, no “uranium to Russia.”

      Of moderately greater interest, one year after Mrs. Clinton left office, the same committee voted unanimously to allow the sale of western mining leases in the ore rich Dewey Burdock tract in South Dakota to China based Azarga Uranium, who does hold an export license. Remember the Republican outrage over that? I didn’t think so.  

The Clinton foundation remains a highly rated charity by Charity Watch, four stars out of four, based on transparency and expenditures. No one named Clinton earns or takes money from it.   

Every word of the above is categorically factual.

No comments:

Post a Comment