What follows is
not based on personal religious belief (or lack thereof) but is rather my commentary on
the hypocrisy on constant display by those who, while carping constantly about
the “scriptural foundations” of their lives, prove the lie of that statement in
their daily action and attitudes.
There
are about 3,000 verses in the Bible that are concerned with social justice,
taking care of the poor, the stranger, attitudes of kindness and compassion. It
is dominant in the Old Testament (with the occasional time out for mass murder and selling one's daughter into slavery)
and the New Testament and there is very little ambiguity in the texts. (Caveat
here: this is never actually read in the original by ranting and raving
muscular Evangelicals,)
So why are
those issues not the dominant concern, of professing Christians, today? If
abortion continues to be the number one priority for so many Christians at the
expense of the issues the Bible does instruct on, are those who make it their
only priority not giving the issue an almost idolatrous seat? I’m not saying
abortion cannot be an important personal issue to a Christian, but there is no,
as in zero, scriptural or historical justification for its being the number one
issue, at the expense of the “least of these” who are suffering and have
suffered at the hands of “good Christians” now and over the previous thousands
of years.
At this point I’ll
“preface" my conclusion, which is that the abortion/prolife controversy is,
in truth, fairly recent and that, only because it has been hijacked as a trigger
point by evangelical preachers and their political cronies. It is instructional
that Donald Trump became a “right to lifer” as a candidate after urging his pregnant
girlfriend to abort her pregnancy rather than marry her, which he did when she
refused. In so proclaiming, he garnered the immediate allegiance of the
Evangelicals who have bought into this single issue at the expense of true
moral behavior.
Not only did most well-known Christian
theologians not take a strong stance on abortion, but neither do the strictest laws of
the Old Testament. Anyone who has studied Old Testament law knows that
very little goes unaddressed, from hair style to fabric choice! Yet, as Ignacio
Castuera points out in A Social History of Christian Thought on Abortion, “The only
passage that deals directly with the death of a fetus is Exodus 21: 23, which
describes the penalty to be incurred for hurting a pregnant woman accidentally
during a fight between two men. According to the Septuagint, if the fetus has
not yet assumed complete human shape, the penalty is a monetary fine; but if
the fetus is fully formed, the penalty is death. Thus, in ancient Israel, killing
a fetus that was not viable was never considered murder.” Even today,
most Jewish teachings hold that life begins not at conception but at birth and,
unsurprisingly, 83% of America Jews believe abortion should be legal in most
cases.
In the New
Testament, there is no direct teaching on abortion. Jesus does not address the
topic specifically and not one of His parables talks about ending a pregnancy.
Neither do any of Paul’s letters mention abortion. Let me restate: There
is absolutely no New Testament discussion re: abortion. Abortion was very prevalent in many of the
places Paul visited – we know this from other historical texts, and as he mentions
in his letters, these cities were brimming with prostitution and illicit sexual
activity. In fact, Paul never had a problem speaking out on any
topic he believed followers of Christ should pay attention to!
This makes it
very interesting that abortion was obviously not a topic of enough priority for
Paul to even mention because, contrary to the many people on Facebook/Twitter/church
signs/billboards who confront us with a challenge to “READ THE WORD ABOUT
ABORTION,” he never does (mention it). And Paul was not ambiguous or shy about
addressing anything he deemed important for a Christian life. There is no “Word”
on abortion.
So, when and
why did the shift in mainstream Christianity and the Catholic Church against
abortion take place if it had been unprecedented among all the other Christian controversies
throughout history? The various factors are numerous and too esoteric to
explore in-depth in this rant, however, the principal and constant underlying
theme of these changes in Catholic Church doctrine, conservative Protestant
socio-economics, politics and culture would seem to be a reaction towards movements
to advance women’s rights and liberalism. There was a gradual shift of
resistance towards such changes and views and laws on contraception, and
abortion started changing within that resistance. Ultimately, it would become a
political tool feeding the increased use of propaganda rhetoric that would take
over thousands of churches in the 1980s.
While the Church had always held that stopping
a pregnancy around week 23-24 was morally wrong and it sometimes held the
position that this was akin to murder, strong teaching and laws against
late-term abortion due to concern for the mother’s health and first and second
trimester abortion restriction was a new thing starting around in the late
1800’s. Another new thing about the same time - the idea of women’s
independence, leadership and the suffrage movements at the turn of the century.
You decide if this is coincidence or not; but I believe that the evidence
suggests otherwise.
In 1860 the
American Medical Association initiated the biggest change in abortion views
ever recorded in history. Castuera says, “Although their motives were blatantly
tinged with self-interest, these mostly Protestant doctors persuaded a number
of states to adopt anti-abortion laws that stayed on the books for a century.
With these efforts, the AMA managed to put some of its competitors out of
business, restrict the public role of women in bourgeois society, and
strengthen the control of conventional male doctors over the field of medicine.
It simply cannot be argued that abortion did not exist in Biblical times or
during the time of Augustine and every other century until the 19th – the only
thing that did begin to change was a liberation for women due to progress and a
change in cultural and social values in the late 1800s.
I believe the
evidence suggests that political forces and resistance to change, the
increasingly strong suffrage movement and later women’s rights movements, are
truly behind the shift in views on abortion and women’s health, and the topic
has become an intersection for conservative politicians to reach voters. Women
in such groups have been gulled into campaigning and voting against their own
self-interest.
Understand the
implication of the above: In a very real
sense, the medical profession transformed abortion from a moral issue into a
medical procedure and imposed the authority of physicians over it.” This shift
also impacted women’s health in the 19th century as doctors started becoming
pressured to not perform abortions or stop pregnancy from occurring, so women
found at-home ways to end pregnancy, which often resulted in their deaths. Most,
except maybe some on the very far left, believe that once a child is able to
live on its own outside the womb, abortion should be out of the question apart
from cases of the viability of the fetus and health of the mother. Furthermore,
only 1.3 percent of abortions are “late term” (after 21 weeks), and these are
almost always the result of a danger to the mother’s life or incurable illness
within the child. It is a heart-breaking decision for parents and one that has
had to be made for hundreds of years, amidst great devastation.
The next big
shift occurred in the 1980s when political conservatives organized around the
topic of abortion and the “moral majority” and Religious Right churches were
borne. Over the years, and in personal conversations or reading the writings of
both conservative and progressive evangelicals, Christians of varying
denominations and Catholics, a consistent theme emerges. Whatever their position
now, most if not all, consistently maintain or at least, if honest, will admit that
before the 1980’s, abortion was never a prioritized topic of the church except rarely
in minority groups. It was not a measure of one’s Christianity as it seems to
have become today and being called a “Christian Democrat” was not an unusual
nor taboo thing. This major shift came about, not because of a “new Christian
doctrine” or new book added to the Bible (there was no Dead Sea Scroll on
abortion found in 1980…), but through political efforts by the GOP and
conservative groups.
This “political
doctrine” has become religious and scriptural doctrine for millions, without
question. A good part of this knee jerk response to the natterings of Evangelical
preachers is the parallel elevation to iconic stature by political figures of men like Billy Graham,
Oral Roberts and other shamans selling God by the pound on TV. You know “Abortion
is wrong and oh yeah, send me the money you reserved for medication.”
There is no
doubt of the sincerity of many Christians who hold an extreme anti-abortion
view. Sincerity should not, however, be conflated with validity. The Zodiac
killer was sincere, so were Idi Amin and Stalin. This not an argument in any
way that the topic of abortion is not an important one, or to be taken lightly
in any way. However, as mentioned earlier, it is simply impossible to justify
the prioritization of the abortion issue over a host of other issues from a
Biblical and historical viewpoint, especially when Biblical passages concerning
other social and moral issues are so prominent.
In
summary: It simply cannot be argued that abortion did not exist in Biblical
times or during the time of Augustine and every other century until the 19th –
the only thing that did begin to change was a liberation for women due to
progress and a change in cultural and social values in the late 1800s, and abortion opposition became a political propaganda tool which would take over thousands of churches by (and primarily in) the 1980s. The church has moved to the extreme Right on this issue,
to the point that anyone holding even a moderate view on abortion, is portrayed
as a far left radical and in fact an accessory to murder! Remember, these
moderate views held by many Progressives are in fact to the Right of the Bible
and the founders of the Christian faith.
The majority of Americans do not fit
into either a “pro-life” or “pro-choice” box but believe in a moderate view
that protects both women’s rights and the unborn. The major point here is: if
more Christians would only start prioritizing the things Jesus their scriptures
tell them, their focus would look drastically different than it does now as a
Body.
There simply is
no “pro-life” label in the Bible, but there is one instance in which Jesus did
label believers. It is in Matthew 25, in a parable called the Sheep and the
Goats, in which he labels those who did or did not help the sick, the poor,
care about those in prison and care for the stranger (he doesn’t specify that
they must be “documented”). As portrayed in the New Testament and proclaimed as
the “Word of God” by those rabid Evangelicals, their Savior made clear His
priorities, yet many true believers, rather than following these simple instructions, have chosen instead to be used by politicians
who have succeeded for several decades in transforming their Christian culture into a voting machine by
pushing the “abortion button.” They are
using the unborn and even the tragic circumstances surrounding abortion to do
it, and that is the real disgrace.
There is a clear reason why there are more than 20,000 brands of Christianity: Individuals claim that God/Jesus has spoken to them (99% of the time while they were alone in a cave or dark room) about what the Bible REALLY means. Then then start their own version of The Church and use whatever emotional (some call it Spiritual) means necessary to grow the organization where the Pastor gets paid and leftover funds are used to gain more parishiners. Calling a fetus (just a mass of tissue) a CHILD just increases the emotional blackmail. If those "Pro-Life" (anti-abortion) people honestly believed the notion that "life" begins at conception, they would petition the medical community to find a way to prevent the hundreds of millions of fertilized eggs from washing out with the menstrual blood every year from women around the world. They haven't. Nor are they adamant about removing IUDs from the marketplace - and IUDs were certainly prevelant back in biblical times (adapted from the stone in a camel uterus). Bottom line: People of all religion have always taken whatever action necessary to grow the flock - and human history is full of examples, especially the most effective way to becoming the Top Religion: Kill the non-believers!! Sigh.
ReplyDelete