“I am heterosexual, which according to gay folks, now makes
me a homophobe.”
Only if you
think it does, Waldo. Most gay folks I know (and I have a significant number of
close gay friends) never make that association. It’s much like “The Gay
Agenda,” (a term invented by some conservative schmuck) in that no gay person
I’ve ever talked to has had the faintest clue what the hell the gay agenda is.
The primary reason, I think, is that persons like you, (apparently) ascribe
your own biases regarding personal liberties and behavior to others. Without
going into the imagined details too far, I’ve heard homophobic men speak of
“recruiting” as a goal of the gay community. Since I am aware, without any fear
of being less that totally correct, that being gay isn’t learned or acquired
behavior, this makes as much sense as the Celtics “recruiting” me, a fat
pleasingly plump 6-foot 1inch, 75year old, to play center. Can’t do it. Not
gonna try.
If there really
was a gay agenda it would be indistinguishable from the “straight agenda,”
which doesn’t exist because straight persons don’t need one. Fair and equitable
treatment under the law is as close to an agenda as 99% 0f the LGBT community
has ever had.
So, my
right-wing friend, if you think being straight makes you a homophobe, then you
almost assuredly are. I assure you that if only you are aware of such feelings,
no LGBT person will ever assume them, based simply on your sexual orientation.
And, finally,
as a classroom teacher for twenty years and a member of an NEA and AFT
affiliated union bargaining and contract team for twelve of those years, I was
party to situations where a teacher was accused of inappropriate activities
with students. In none of these cases was a gay teacher involved. Not one.
Likewise, I served almost 50 working years with teachers and Naval personnel
whose sexual orientation never was an issue, gay or straight. So, maybe the
problem is you?
“I used to think I was just a regular guy, but I was born white, which now, whether I like it or not, makes me a racist and responsible for slavery.”
Aww, c’mon, you do like it, admit it. You’ll feel better. If you actually believe that pigment confers anything but skin color, you are far worse off than simply racist. You have a mental defect and are biologically illiterate. Attitudes, good or bad, regarding race are learned. No rational person has ever suggested to you or anyone else that simply by being born Caucasian, anyone is a racist. Have some Caucasians treated persons of color badly, historically? Yep. Are you one of them? Therein lies the actuality of whether or not you’re a racist.
The larger
picture is that what you say is a stereotype with which you label the entirety
of humanity who might not share your biases.
You justify being the angry white guy by transferring your unwarranted
assumptions to others who you then feel justified in derogating. If I have an instinctive dislike or irrational
fear of cats, no person of sound mind would label all cats “evil” or
“dangerous” even though that’s how I, phobic as I would have to be, regard
them. Most rational folks would understand that the problem isn’t cats, it’s
me. The distorted mental perspective is mine. That’s a pretty fair analogy
regarding your attitude toward race. The mental issue is yours, and that of
those like you. And to be factual, which of course, you haven’t been, there are
those of color who also see the world through a similarly distorted lens of
preconception and bias. Like you, their biases are products of acculturation,
not birth. Both you and they are the anomalies. Both make life more trying for
people of good will.
No comments:
Post a Comment