The more things
change…….
It seems to
never end and never change. The scenario is always some version of this: An
individual takes offense at some political (statement, cartoon, meme) which
casts Trump in an unfavorable light. The response is typically not,
unfortunately, to respond with a defense listing specifics about the man which
are exemplary of good decisions, actions, or programs but rather, in some
bizzarro world approach, to attack either the writer, Trump opponents or, in
the oddest cases, Barack Obama, three years out of office.
In a recent slight
twist on the story, the response was not any defense of Trump (No surprise
here) but to question how I (we) were “worse off” because of him. Realize that
this plumbs the depths of “lame.” Ask a (Christian, Buddhist, Beatles, Orioles,
Lady Gaga) supporter why they feel as they do, and you will generally get a
litany of reasons. One may disagree, but there will be reasons. Ask a Trump
supporter, and I have, many times, and while you may get the odd
generalization, you will rarely get any specific response which logically supports
such fan girl or boy worship. Moreover, such reasons, when they are proffered at
all, are almost always based on either flawed logic, ignorance, or simply
demonstrable untruths. One suspects other reasons the fan is hesitant to share,
perhaps?
Recently, the
question was the “How are “you” (we) worse off because of Trump?” Without too much
repetitious detail, my response alluded to the fact that as a society, we are
all part of the whole. I might have simply chosen the Biblical, “In as much as
you have done it to the least of these, my brethren, you have done it unto me.”
(also, a Buddhist and Confucian sentiment predating Christ by hundreds of years).
Unfortunately, many, if not most, Trump supporters don’t see the world that way, even though many stridently proclaim their muscular Christianity while ignoring their leader's precepts, a blindingly blatant contradiction in terms. As a beginning point,
and to ensure understanding, realize that Trumpists see American society as Us and Them.
In any event my
response was an inclusive listing of economic bad decisions, and the
expenditure of our tax dollars to pay for them, the grave erosion of foreign
relations with most of Europe (except, of course, Russia), stigmatization of
minorities in various ways, etc.
Having provided
the documented specifics requested, it still came as no surprise that the
response made absolutely no effort to refute or even defend any of them. What,
you ask was the response? Well, it began with a gross mischaracterization of
where I live (“Hoity toity” …really? Who even uses that phrase in the 21st
century?) Apparently, living in a retirement community which encompasses all
levels of homes from manufactured homes to 1200 square foot villas to 3500
square foot site-built houses, disqualifies me from having a social conscience.
Of course, the individual also is blatantly unaware that The Villages is a bastion of Trump
supporters, the majority middle class retirees. We then progressed to inferring that
somehow, I have been insulated from a diversity of ethnic origins, ignoring 26 years of
naval service with all ethnicities involved, or 20 years of inner-city
public-school service. It then turned to questioning our personal charitable
activities.
See where we’re going here? If only one side of a discussion is willing or
prepared to engage in said discourse with fact or reasoned opinion, then the
conversation is impossible. In the past three years, only once has anyone responded
to a plea for reasoned conversation with any measured thoughtful response to
the issues, vice personal attacks or finger pointing, and in that case, they had
such huge and documented gaps in their argument that the point was moot.
When
Trump’s much ballyhooed personal choice for Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, finally
having had enough, resigned, characterizing Trump as “a moron,” that should have
bothered his supporters, but it didn’t. As of today, 18 of Trump’s personal
picks for “A” team (inner circle/cabinet/national security) jobs have been
replaced at least twice since the original appointment, some three times. Were they
all bad people?
The alternative answer is the one Trumpist grassroots supporters don’t want to consider. Their emperor is “bare assed nekkid!”
The alternative answer is the one Trumpist grassroots supporters don’t want to consider. Their emperor is “bare assed nekkid!”
No comments:
Post a Comment