In the
Aftermath
So, what's
going on this week other than that election "thingy" on Tuesday.” First (and
worst) of all, we still have many Far-Right members of the GOP scurrying to convince
the deplorables that the attack on Paul Pelosi was the act of a “lone wolf” and
not in any way engendered by their rhetoric. Texas’s Ted Cruz shared a tweet
calling the attacker "a hippie nudist from Berkeley" and dismissed
the idea that the attack was motivated by right-wing ideology as
"absurd." Others have actually claimed the FBI orchestrated the
attack as a “false flag” to discredit the GOP’s radical wing. The attacker was
a known Far Right loony who might well have killed Speaker Pelosi had she been
home. We now have many of the GOP, including multiple members of Congress,
treating this incident as Alex Jones did the Sandy Hook school shootings.
This particular flavor of bullshit
goes all the way back to well before Donald Trump's pre-election statements of
2016 and has continued right on through to the present. When we got stuck with Donald
Trump, we saw a complete departure from presidential restraint and consensus
building. What once were the natterings of isolated groups of malcontent
morons, became mainstream poison. I've been politically aware since the
Eisenhower administration and have never heard an American chief executive be
as confrontational, derogatory, or vengeful as Donald Trump.
Sadly, many of those Americans who have lurked
in these shadows harboring feelings of racism, anti-Semitism, and dissatisfaction
with the misery of their own lives, have come to feel empowered by this new
openness of hate speech. To be frank, in the modern era Trump did not invent
this concept of publicly digging into the hidden frustrations and bigotry of
some Americans. Dissatisfied Southern Democrats (Dixiecrats) went there in
1948, when Harry Truman urged the inclusion a civil rights plank in the
Democratic platform. They left the party and ran vile racist, Strom Thurman as
an alternate candidate. It should be no surprise that they then became
Republicans by 1952, in time to become a thorn in the side of Dwight
Eisenhower. Later, Newt Gingrich refined this to a great extent, largely through
his own rhetoric and even more so because of his support for people like Rush
Limbaugh who became, in essence, “Alex Jones lite.”
When, in 1987, Ronald Reagan
essentially quashed the FCC’s “fairness doctrine” which required media outlets
to allow the presentation of both sides of controversial issues, he opened the
door to the current plethora of unaccountable broadcast liars such as the
Hannitys, Carlsons and Ingrahams.
The fairness doctrine consisted of two
basic elements: It required broadcasters to devote some of their airtime to
discussing controversial matters of public interest, and to air
contrasting views regarding those matters. Stations were given wide
latitude as to how to provide contrasting views: It could be done through news
segments, public affairs shows, or editorials. The doctrine did not require
equal time for opposing views but required that contrasting viewpoints be
presented. The demise of this FCC rule has been cited by many social observers
as a prime contributing factor in the escalation of party polarization in the
United States.
By the time this op-ed sees
publication, we will know the outcome of Tuesday’s vote. Some recent political
candidate ads were markedly more aggressive than the pre-Trump era. The tragic
aspect of this is that many of the candidates who were running the most
aggressive and confrontational ads are people who still see any indication of
not supporting Trump as a negative among voters of their party, ergo they will
say things they may not even believe in campaign ads because they don't want to
anger the great orange Wizard of Oz. One current example would be Nevada Senate
GOP candidate Adam Laxalt who like a disappointing number of other Republicans
continues to use the words “open border” or something similar to imply that the
current administration has “dismantled border security” (Laxalt’s words). In
fact: funding for Customs and Border security in the Biden administration is
precisely comparable to that of the Trump administration. Border Patrol
staffing under the Biden administration is consistent with the Trump
administration. And finally, the laws and policies to prevent immigrants from
remaining in the US illegally continue under the Biden administration to remain
exactly the same as they were. In point of fact, for fiscal year 2022 Congress
appointed over a billion dollars more for border security than any of the four Trump
budgets.
On a local note, we saw similar
claims from Marco Rubio. We have seen him claim that Val Demings, his opponent,
“votes with Pelosi 100% of the time.” (Just like he voted with his party?) He
has falsely implied that Congresswoman Demings would support defunding the
police when, in fact, she was one of the few Democrats who voted against a bill
to open the doors to that happening. We were also exposed to Governor Ron
DeSantis claiming that he's keeping Florida “free” while restricting the
ability of public-school teachers to do their jobs. We also saw DeSantis
decrying the economy under former governor Charlie Crist, which ignores the
fact that Crist’s governorship coincided with the major economic national
recession caused by eight years of inadequate supervision of financial markets
and the housing bubble collapse. In other words, like Barack Obama would be in
2008, Charlie Crist was also the recipient of a bad economy that affected the
entire world, not just the state of Florida.
As of my writing this, I am
hopeful, but by no means optimistic, regarding the results of the election. We
surely deserve better than we have in Rubio’s (and Scott’s, but he didn’t run
this cycle) Senate seats and in the Governor’s mansion. I loved teaching my 20
years at Boone High school, but I don’t think I’d make it a full year teaching
real history under current restrictions. Stay strong and please remain
politically active.
No comments:
Post a Comment