Regarding Sea World finally going on the record in refutation of the scurrilous "Mocumentary" - "Black Fish":
It's about damned time! Like PETA, Earth First, and the other animal rights fanatics who are "born again" in the sense that they have apparently come to an epiphany regarding that about which they really know very little and would, in the extreme like PETA, rather kill animals... than have them taken care of by humans, this is a seriously flawed "Mockumentary."
It's about damned time! Like PETA, Earth First, and the other animal rights fanatics who are "born again" in the sense that they have apparently come to an epiphany regarding that about which they really know very little and would, in the extreme like PETA, rather kill animals... than have them taken care of by humans, this is a seriously flawed "Mockumentary."
It is the product of the same approach as "Creation Science" in that the film makers began with their conclusions and reverse engineered everything else, disavowing what refutes their position and skewing the rest. This is essentially a “Swift Boat” job, not journalistic film making. (Yes, I’ve watched and then deleted it, lest it infect my computer!)
Of course a major gross inaccuracy is that the blame for Tillikum’s behavior is leveled at Sea World, who had no hand in his 1983 capture off Iceland at around three years of age, and was actually his third “owner’ after he had been maltreated elsewhere and was essentially unreturnable to the ocean. Would PETA have SEA World sell him for dog food? Does this make him fundamentally different from the host of captive born Orcas in marine parks around the world? Of course it does.
Although PETA is not responsible for the film, you can bet they will support it and embrace it as if they had financed it. Of course they (PETA) couldn’t afford to finance it because so much of their annual income, which they allege is used for the protection of animals, actually is used by them in their role of publicity damage control after they have spent what they use for killing dogs and cats!
“The organization reportedly destroyed almost 90% of all the animals dropped off at its headquarters in Norfolk, Va., in 2012, according to the Daily Mail.” Over a span of the last 14 years, PETA has killed more than 29,000 animals. So what’s another Orca or two?
Of course a major gross inaccuracy is that the blame for Tillikum’s behavior is leveled at Sea World, who had no hand in his 1983 capture off Iceland at around three years of age, and was actually his third “owner’ after he had been maltreated elsewhere and was essentially unreturnable to the ocean. Would PETA have SEA World sell him for dog food? Does this make him fundamentally different from the host of captive born Orcas in marine parks around the world? Of course it does.
Although PETA is not responsible for the film, you can bet they will support it and embrace it as if they had financed it. Of course they (PETA) couldn’t afford to finance it because so much of their annual income, which they allege is used for the protection of animals, actually is used by them in their role of publicity damage control after they have spent what they use for killing dogs and cats!
“The organization reportedly destroyed almost 90% of all the animals dropped off at its headquarters in Norfolk, Va., in 2012, according to the Daily Mail.” Over a span of the last 14 years, PETA has killed more than 29,000 animals. So what’s another Orca or two?
No comments:
Post a Comment