I am simply fed up with Tea Partiers calling themselves
patriots. The word patriot has become one of the most misused words in the
language these days. A case study would be Senator Ted Cruz. Born in Alberta
Canada, he is a citizen of Canada and, he claims, the US, but has never done
any national service, in much the same way as some other Tea Party darlings,
Ted Nugent included. I am not implying
that military service makes one a patriot or that lack of same is a disability.
I am, however, stating that criticizing the patriotism of someone who has done
so but also has different viewpoints, is morally bankrupt. It would be similar
to pointing out that Ted Cruze’s dad fought on the side of Castro in Cuba. He
did, became disillusioned and came to America. If a Cruz opponent had similar
family history….well you get the drift.
A more interesting question may be why Cruz doesn’t renounce
his Canadian citizenship. As of September 20, this year, Sen. Ted Cruz is still
a Canadian citizen. Although it has now been over a month since he promised to
renounce his Canadian citizenship – which he obtained by virtue of his birth in
Calgary, Alberta – he has not followed
through on the commitment. His website
is mute on the subject, his official bio doesn’t even mention “Canada.”
In an earlier (August) e-mail Cruz stated: “I will renounce any Canadian
citizenship. Nothing against Canada, but I’m an American citizen by birth and
as a U.S. senator, I believe I should be only an American.”
While that sentiment may have been sincere then, when he
needed a sound bite response, he is
still holding on to both his Canadian citizenship and his Senate seat. Cruz, is
already courting conservative votes in Iowa waaaay in advance of the caucuses,
so the question must be asked: What keeps Ted Cruz from finally renouncing his
Canadian citizenship?
There is actually a process. Canada requires a filing of
intention to renounce Canadian citizenship - simple enough. There are only 12
questions on the application, and most of them request basic information such
as name, address and date of birth, all of which are self explanatory and could
be could be handled by a staffer. “There is one section, however, that could
cause Cruz some trouble, and perhaps that is the reason for his delay. Question
5 instructs the applicant to “attach proof” that he is (or will become) a
citizen of a country other than Canada. That may seem like it is none of
Canada’s business, but in fact the requirement follows from important
principles of international law – including the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights – which call upon governments to protect individuals from
becoming stateless……… and in any event, it is up to Canada to decide how and in
what manner its citizenship may be annulled – the U.S. has similar rules – and
Cruz has no choice but to follow the necessary protocol.” (Steve Lubet,
Salon, Sept 20, 2013)
In order to fulfill his promise to the voters, Cruz must
therefore submit proof that he is a U.S. citizen, which will be trickier for
him than for most people. Cruz has released only his Canadian birth
certificate, which confirms that he was born in Calgary, Alberta, in 1970, and
additionally states that his mother was born in Wilmington, Del.. The second
part is crucial – Cruz’s only claim to U.S. citizenship is through his mother,
since his father didn’t become a citizen until 2005, but it is also hearsay.
The birth certificate is primary evidence of Cruz’s own birth, but the entry
about his mother merely records her assertion to the Alberta Division of Vital
Statistics. “ Because my mother said so” is not what is usually meant by
“proof.” Where is the Birther” outrage?
How, then, can Ted Cruz prove his U.S. citizenship to the
satisfaction of the Canadian authorities and, of course, to his constituents? The only incontrovertible proof would be his
mother’s birth certificate, presumably issued when she was born in Delaware. Still, however, problematic. Because only one of Cruz’s parents was a
citizen when he was born, he falls under
a special section of the Immigration and Nationality Act that applies to “Birth
Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent.” Under that provision, Cruz only
qualifies for American citizenship if his mother was “physically present” in
the United States for 10 years prior to his birth, five of which had to be
after she reached the age of 14. The only definitive way to prove Eleanor
Cruz’s 10 years of physical presence would be with documents such as leases,
school registration, utility bills or tax records, none of which are
forthcoming or in evidence.
Of course, we don’t know how rigorous the Canadians are
about evidence of citizenship, but we do know that they will not be willing
simply to take Ted’s word for it. Their form is very specific about requiring
documentary proof, and that might be hard for Ted to come by. Could that be the
reason for Cruz’s delayed renunciation? It would be pretty embarrassing to have
his Application to Renounce Canadian Citizenship denied on a technicality.
One other thing we do
know about Ted Cruz is that he is adamant about defunding the Affordable Health
Care Act (Obamacare), which he has pursued with a manic fury, holding the
nation hostage to curry favor with his Tea Party “patriot” amigos.. The
result could be the loss of medical insurance for over 10 million Americans,
but I guess that won’t bother Ted. After all, this darling of the Tea party,
this self styled “patriot,” is entitled to free medical care as long as he
remains a Canadian citizen.
It may be significant that Cruz’s wife currently is the Southwest
regional head of Goldman Sachs’ investment division. It is also worthy of note
that Goldman Sachs has recently entered into an agreement to acquire an
insurance affiliate which helps to explain his crusade
to keep health care insurance private and lucrative, huh? Goldman Sachs, you
may remember was also a principal player in the AIG (another insurance giant)
bailout. Should we all pay the price of Ted
Cruz making his wife happy? We should not be confused about this intertwining
of political and private interests, since Ted Cruz studied under Dick Cheyney
(Halliburton) while a Bush staffer!
Again, as an actual historian, I feel it appropriate to
point out that the "real patriots" of the revolutionary period were
men like John Hancock, Ben Franklin, Jefferson, Washington, et al. Calling the
drunken mob that threw tea into the harbor in Boston "patriots" is a
real stretch. Even Samuel Adams, great brewer and superb rabble rouser was
stunned and dismayed by, and heartily regretted the violence he had incited. Real patriots
risk their fortunes and their lives for principles. Look at the attitudes of
the Tea Party rabble. Look at the content of their signs and listen to the
hatred coming out of their mouths. Sam Adams would recognize them and be very
afraid. As a 26 year Navy veteran, I consider myself a patriot. I also consider
that reason dictates that the will of the majority is supposed to be the
determinant factor in how national decisions are carried out. Ted Cruz is no patriot, he simply plays one on TV. He is categorically
a liar, and is on the record numerous times in that guise. He is simply a Canadian
/Texan trying to convince idiots to vote for him, and he is simply another in a
list of similar shams, from Perry to Bachmann and the rest.
No comments:
Post a Comment