Things I believe #3
I believe
we're becoming, nay, have become, a nation of vampires. I don't mean the nice
Bram Stoker Dracula kind who just kill for food. They just suck out their
victim's blood, but these modern day models feed on their victim's emotions , as well.
There's a
great German word, so good that we have no single word English language
analogy. The word is "Schadenfreude."
It translates as, "Pleasure derived by someone from another
person's misfortune." The immediacy
of 24 hour news and social media have
become, I believe, the vectors of this virus which infects so many. Like
vampirism, it only works if someone else is damaged; but unlike vampirism, the
damage doesn't confer immortality. Also unlike vampirism, the invention of
medieval ignorance , refined by 19th century fiction, Schadenfreude is real and
in front of us every day.
Tiger Woods
has an unexpected drug reaction, not driving, but found asleep in his car, the
initial report reads "DUI." The haters immediately smile, gloat
briefly and begin typing. The list of immediate allegations, assumptions,
etc, is long and vile. There is a
palpable disappointment when his blood alcohol is revealed to have been .000 at
the time.
Frequently we
rationalize our own schadenfreude as simply (insert misfortunate person here)
"getting what's coming to them." To be sure, there are individuals whose bad behavior
makes them prime targets of such a reaction, and it's difficult not to smile and
mutter "karma is a bitch," but it becomes troublesome when we choose
an entire class of persons, by race, nationality, religion, gender preference
etc, and delight in any ill which befalls a member of said group.
A recent news
article details the sad story of an Australian tourist in San Francisco who died
after a fall on concrete steps as a result of a bar fight which started elsewhere,
finished with his falling on the stairs. The spate of negativity directed
toward, not the persons involved, but at the city itself was almost
unbelievable, as the vampires drew energy from the death of a tourist and vented
it toward that "hotbed of liberalism." Guns figure prominently, gangs, liberal
laws, gays, etc, and the list went on. San Francisco was blasted as liberal haven of all things evil.
As it turns out the initial actual police
report states that there were no weapons involved and whatever conflict there had been had started earlier as both
sides were drinking. Conspicuous by its absence in the Far right diatribes, was
any mention of alcohol, or that the Aussie, who may have been drinking a bit
(ya think) may well have been a willing participant and maybe at least
partially to blame for the tragedy which ensued.
In the United
States (and, I am sure elsewhere) this seems to be compounded by several
crippling syndromes. The first is troubling because it is only effective at the
extremes, This is either the willingness to believe anything derogatory without
the least scintilla of corroborative fact, or its inverse, the refusal to
believe data driven categorical truth if it's personally unpleasant or
antithetical to one's political persuasion.
Another thing
I believe is that a person who has no ability to rationally evaluate all sides
of any argument is incapable of expressing a relevant and/or considered
opinion. Having said that, I support the recent firing of Kathy Griffin simply
because what she did was in execrable taste, and if I were a media entity, I
would have terminated our relationship for that reason. This isn't about free
speech. Ms. Griffin, who lost her funny about five years ago, used her right to
free speech and her employer responded, as was their right, in ending their relationship
because they pay the bills and she had become a liability. Notice the glee from
the Far Right which was, unsurprisingly,
not glee but outrage when Dock Dynasty's inbred clan was also terminated, albeit too briefly.
Now, having
established that, let's talk about the outrage expressed by persons of both
sides of the political spectrum, but, more specifically the Far Right who apparently wanted her arrested as well as
fired. Where were these ultra conservatives when Ted Nugent spoke of shooting
President Obama? where was the outrage when, over 8 years slurs abounded re:
Michelle Obama, her husband and their daughters? The silence from most on the right was deafening. This one sided bias, I
maintain is one critical difference between Social Liberals and Conservatives.
It manifests
in numerous ways. Most who believe that global warming is real and should be of
concern, do so because they have considered that the opinions of more than 90%
of the world's climatologists are more persuasive than the 10% or so who maintain
that it isn't "real," but rather invented by China, as #45 opined
during the 2016 campaign. Critical
thinking, if available, applies here. Many have considered both sides and made up their own
mind. This is too often not the case in the other extreme.
The collapse
of Delaware sized ice floes from the Ross shelf are apparently unpersuasive,
but the natterings of persons who have only opinions, not facts, like Rick Santorum
and others with interests in the energy industry are absolute truths. Religion
also plays a significant role here, because most if not all evangelical Christians
are also climate change deniers. I
believe this comes from some deep seated realization that if man can change his
world, for the better or the worse, perhaps this whole "creation story"
thing is really a "creation myth" which is how Christians, Muslims
and Jews refer to all other religions' origin fables.
The pathetic
corollary here is that these "true believers" also tend to be
ridiculously easy marks for charlatans selling God and themselves by the pound
on TV. It is appalling to me that we are bombarded with news stories of persons
who have been elected to the US Congress who pontificate pronouncements that "God will ....(fill
in miracle here)" which are really meant to be statements more on the
order of "look at how reverent I am."
A similar sentiment is that expressed when someone recovers from serious
illness and thanks the sky magus as if the efforts of the medical personnel
involved were of little consequence. These people apparently have never
considered that if their God actually listened and interfered in human's lives
and cared deeply about her most devout believers, there would be the
descendents of about 6 million more Jewish people alive today.
No comments:
Post a Comment