I am sick and tired of seeing the following leap of
illogic:
Someone
speaks of the issues that "liberals" if we must use labels, have
espoused over the years, and then, as if there were direct linkage, blames the
federal debt on liberals - a lie (look at the Reagan and both Bush's debt
increases in times of relative good economies) and pretends that makes the
entire position null and void. An accurate paraphrase might be: "because
we don't like most of the things liberals think are important, we'll blame the
debt on them to hide the fact that we are bigoted, mean spirited and
ignorant." below are some things "liberal" which have little
economic impact at all, but are kicked to the curb by the Right, because their
real agenda (the Far right) is really anti "everyone else different from
me."
the
21st amendment -
no cost, but more than half of Americans were granted full rights as
citizens for the first time. (for those of you who are Conservatives, that
means votes for women.
The
end to legal racial segregation
- no cost, actually cost savings in the
South where dual school systems were
outlawed
Roe
v. Wade - According
to several studies, the decrease in urban crime during the nineties (which ran
counter to the predictions of every law enforcement expert in America) was a
direct result of thousands of unwanted children not being born to parents who
had no capability or intention of raising them.
The
Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting rights Act of 1965
- two of the most important pieces of legislation ever passed, forced those who
would violate both the spirit and letter of the Constitution to stop doing
so (the only cost here is enforcement in
those cases where bigots and haters still resist obeying the law)
Clean
air and Clean water Acts and the creation of the EPA (signed into law by that environmental
activist Richard M. Nixon) - again, yes, there are costs, but look at China if
you really want to see how bad things could be without them.
Medicare
- The big lie here is based on one (or both)
of two assumptions 1: Some
persons just don't deserve as good health care as others because they're not as
important or as smart, or as white, or whatever. (And don't you dare tell me there are not
those who hold this opinion - I have worked with some) 2: Medicare is an expense we wouldn't have
if it weren't for all those liberals who helped enact it. The reality, based on
seeing countless case studies, is that in the absence of affordable health care,
people often don't go to a doctor until their particular medical condition is
so severe that they present at the local emergency room in crisis. A medical
emergency that could have been
resolved with preventive care or early
treatment becomes an extended hospital stay and the cost is borne by the
taxpayer anyway, but it's a much larger cost!
Lack of simple prenatal care carries with it a huge economic cost in
extended hospitalization, in some cases for both mother and child.
Equality
for all Americans: The Defense of Marriage Act, touted by
Rick Perry and others was a miserably
misdirected solution to a non-existent problem. Letting same sex couples marry
would cost nothing, and have zero effect on anybody else's marriage. Resistance
by conservatives on this point is based on religious bigotry, and flies in the
face of all logic. Christians who say they believe in a New Testament God,
reject all the little annoyances in Leviticus like dietary laws, selling their
daughters into slavery, or killing their neighbor for mowing the lawn on Sunday,
medical treatments for rashes, etc. Hell, you can't even get a Born Again to
sacrifice a dove or lamb or a calf
anymore, and when Santeria worshippers do it in Miami, they go nuts! But
homosexuality - well now, God was really
serious about that, so let's ignore everything but that. Sounds silly when you
look at it like that, doesn't it. Almost certainly the apostle Paul felt that
way too, which is why he urged men not to marry if they didn't have to. (Was Paul g**?) If your marriage needs
defending by the government, it has already failed quicker than a Kristen
Stewart romance.
No comments:
Post a Comment