I play golf
with several good friends, many of whom are
more conservative than I. because we are
rational persons and good friends, that never gets in the way of out
friendships, but it does lead to interesting conversations within the hallowed
confines of the golf cart, sometimes.
Yesterday, One
such discussion took the line of "We used to have great healthcare in (name of home state) , but that damned Obamacare ruined it." At this point I was forced to reflect for a
moment on what one could possibly have to do with the other. Further discussion revealed my friend's
growing dissatisfaction with the situation of a close relative who is disabled
and in hospital following a serious accident. As the individual in question is
in their later years, I asked one simple question. "Is (the person) on Medicare?"
The answer, in the affirmative, hammered home the point once again that there
are people who will blame anything and everything health related (or otherwise,
too) on the current resident of the White House. I refused to let this drop,
pointing out several times the fact that Medicare isn't in any real way related
to the Affordable Care Act, especially in this case. He harrumphed, and we left
it at that.
Later in the
round, discussing mutual interests with a far more informed friend and superb
cart mate, I asked how they felt about single payer health care. The immediate
response as I knew it would be, was that they were opposed to it. My innocent
question "So you don't use Medicare?" was met with the sound of
crickets.
I say that to
say this: If you are a conservative who takes what seems to be the reflexive
Far Right point that national or single payer health care systems don't work or
are opposed to them as "socialist schemes," then you must realize
that we already have a significant number of Americans on single payer
healthcare and have for almost 50 years. Over 50 million Americans are currently
using a National, single payer, healthcare system. Because this system was
forbidden by legislation passed and signed by the Bush administration in 2001, Medicare pays far more in costs to providers
than other such systems. 2003
legislation, a gift to the drug industry (whose lobbying expenses are larger
that their Research expenditures every year for the past 15) stipulates that Medicare,
Part D will not be allowed to negotiate lower drug prices, as do European
systems, which frequently pay 1/10 the price for the identical brand name
drugs.
Drug companies imply
that they must impose higher prices in
the U.S. to pay for research that enables them to innovate and develop new
drugs that save lives. Reality is far
different. Half of the scientifically innovative drugs approved in the U.S.
from 1998 to 2007 resulted from research at universities and biotech firms, not
big drug companies. Despite their rhetoric, drug companies spend 19 times more
on marketing than on research and development.”
Meanwhile, the
US spends twice as much (as a % of GDP, a fair way to evaluate) per capita per
year as the UK does on healthcare. Don't blame the Affordable Care Act, and
don't think you're not already paying for universal healthcare for a large
sector of the populace. Don't like the ACA? Then maybe you should shut your
ears to the rhetoric of Cruz, Rubio and others , do the research and make up
your own mind about the realities of single payer health care.
No comments:
Post a Comment