Greed Gone Wild, A Banking Story of a Different Kind
04/05/2023
It amazed me (but probably
shouldn’t have) when Congresspersons and other ignoramuses eagerly leapt on the
“Woke” train to blame Silicon Valley Bank’s crisis on issues far more mundane
and totally unrelated to any remotely “woke” issues (The woke Federal reserve
system? Woke low interest Treasury bills? Spare me)
And I had a revelation last night.
MTG has been somewhat quiet on this issue because she doesn’t even understand
how commercial banks work.
There, with that out of the way, the
next phase of woke slinging may well be to, in some alternate Universe, tie the
SVB problems to the recently announced bailout of Credit Suisse. For the
uninitiated, Credit Suisse for years, protected by Swiss banking shields which
were based on denying any outside access to depositor data, thrived by being
the overseas cache for rich Americans to shield their money from rightful owed
taxation. In a 2014 plea agreement with the US, CS (I’m tired of typing the
whole name, deal with it) copped to illegally shielding more than $12 billion in
assets for wealthy Americans, agreed to stop doing it, and paid a compensatory
“fine” of $2.7 million. What was missing from the settlement were the names of most
of the US tax scofflaws. By early 2014, before it struck its plea deal that
May, Credit Suisse had only divulged information on some 238 out of 22,000 U.S.
clients. Again, admitting what they did and that it was illegal. But not who
they did it for.
That was 2014. The next
administration had little or no interest in white collar crime, seeing as how
the President himself was a white-collar crook and had been for years.
The current financial crisis at CS
boiled over last week when the bank announced "material weaknesses"
in its financial reporting. Before shouting “woke,” and blaming the SVB
collapse, however, US legislators would do well to consider that the CS
troubles started long before that, with a series of financial and political
scandals that hit the bank's reputation and bottom line hard. In the last two
years alone, the bank's stock has fallen by more than 80%. It’s hard to think
of any corporation which would survive an 80% drop off in value, especially
since it was the own doing by shoddy and illegal practices. CS’s reputation has taken a number of huge
hits in recent years, including being linked to a money laundering operation
involving a cocaine trafficking ring in Bulgaria, and hiring detectives to spy
on an executive who left to work at a rival bank. Seems they just can’t live
within the law, huh? To aggravate matters more, even though in February of 2014
following the huge fine and settlement, Credit Suisse’s chief executive at the
time, Brady Dougan, told lawmakers at a hearing that the bank had cleaned up so
that it only did business with clients who were in compliance with tax
laws.
So that’s that, huh? Not exactly.
Some months after the plea deal was inked and CS promised to play fair, a
whistleblower, through his lawyer, provided some troubling facts.
In an interview, the
whistle-blower’s lawyer, said that after the plea deal was signed and as Credit
Suisse awaited its final sentencing, he told officials at the tax division of
the Justice Department and federal prosecutors who had worked on the case that
his client had information that the bank had continued to cloak money held by
some U.S. account holders. He gave them one name in particular — Dan Horsky, a
retired business professor, who lived in Rochester, N.Y. The following year,
federal agents arrested Mr. Horsky, who had amassed a $200 million untaxed fortune
and hidden it with the help of Credit Suisse bankers, using offshore shell companies.
This from court transcripts and Horsky’s admission under oath. The arrangement
lasted for months after the bank signed its plea deal.
Horsky plead out, and in 2017 was
sentenced to just 7 months in prison after promising to cooperate fully with
prosecutors. The whistleblower, assuming he lives to collect it, could be
richly rewarded if US prosecutors move to impose more fines on CS. Under an
I.R.S. rule, whistle blowers can get as much as 30 percent of the amount of any
additional money the government gets. And, his attorney said, the whistle
blower has more names of American accountholders beyond Mr. Horsky’s, although
he wouldn’t say how many.
Switzerland has been one of the
largest offshore financial centers and tax havens in the world
since the mid-20th century. Despite an international effort push to
meaningfully roll back banking secrecy laws in the country, Swiss social and
political forces have minimized and reverted much of proposed rollbacks.
Although disclosing criminal activities by banks, who do not enjoy a good
reputation even in Switzerland, is generally well seen by the Swiss public,
disclosing client information has been prosecuted as a criminal offence since
the early 1900s. Employees working in Switzerland and abroad at Swiss banks have
been advised to adhere to an unwritten code similar to that observed by doctors
or priests". Since 1934, banking secrecy laws have been violated by only four
people.
Starting as a way to protect
wealthy European banking interests, Swiss banking secrecy was codified in 1934
with the passage of the Federal Act on Banks and Savings Banks. These laws,
which were used to protect assets of persons being persecuted by Nazi
authorities, have also been used by people and institutions seeking to
illegally evade taxes, hide assets, or generally commit financial crime.
This bank failure is so unlike SVB
that to even compare them is ludicrous, but someone will do it and maybe even
blame the SVB collapse for triggering the Credit Suisse collapse which was
already imminent due to their own illegal banking practices. And bet on it that
some of those American tax scofflaws are well, known and politically active. CS
has been bought out by their largest competitor. Under the deal, UBS Group AG will buy Credit
Suisse for more than $3 billion in an all stock deal. How they will handle the
deposits and practices of CS remains to be seen. Either way SVB is unrelated to
the decline and fall of this crooked Swiss Bank, so save your “woke.” SVB was due to poor economic investment management
and unforeseen FED actions, Credit Suisse was more like a record of criminal
conspiracy which had damaged the value of their brand to the point that any
global banking concern was the straw, and they were the camel.
No comments:
Post a Comment