Thursday, February 23, 2017

Culturally illiterate and Blissfully Unconcerned



        The Trump administration’s proposed budget, as it has been ballyhooed to his  masses of co-deplorables,  eliminates the federal agencies that are the bedrock of America’s cultural and artistic vision: the National Endowment for the Humanities and the National Endowment for the Arts. Shutting down these critical agencies is not a financial decision to balance the federal balance sheet: Their budgets are relatively  small, and together with the Corporation for Public Broadcasting also, unbelievably, on the chopping block, they constitute just under  0.02 percent of the annual federal budget. For the math challenged, that's 1/5000th   of the whole budget. However, their impact is exponentially large and has garnered bipartisan support across the country for their role in job creation and attracting businesses into communities.

        Fun fact,  about 1/3 of the total federal budget is comprised of programs which cost below 25 billion or less, which is roughly the same as the amount allotted to both of the previously mentioned agencies. Secondarily that's about how big a budget share  is spent on farm and agricultural subsidies, which are almost universally agreed to be gratuitous corporate welfare.

       What may well be even more significant is that  those dollars, unlike farm subsidies which enrich those who are already well off, serve as incentive money for local efforts.  State humanities councils leverage about $5 in additional private money for every federal $1 dollar spent at the local level,  providing seed money that attracts additional foundation, corporate, state government and individual support. This essentially makes the NEA and NEH the sole federal organizations which produce more than they receive. Don't even get me started on PBS. Only a psychotic game show host (oh, wait, he was, wasn't he?) would believe that PBS is unessential to our collective cultural well being.

       But why? Why spend this money at all? As an educator, I can give an answer based on experience, and that is that many of my best students were those who were engaged in school sponsored  arts programs. Not talking about only super bright kids who dabbled, here, I'm referring to across the board  performance for just about every kid who played an instrument including voice, acted, drew, danced, molded clay, etc. My second language learners who were in music programs even seemed to acquire English faster.

        Yeah, I know, that was your experience, but...? Well the but is that my experience turns out to be just about the norm nationwide when comparing "arts kids" with non arts-involved  students. I also was an SAT prep coach. Data shows that there is an essentially linear improvement curve on SAT verbal performance relative to years of arts education.  the results are similar for math SAT scores. Comparing average  "arts involved" student and "non arts involved" student scores shows that for those kids having 4 years of an arts curriculum or involvement,  the Math score was 7% higher, while verbal was  a whopping 11.9% higher!  These are "get in" or "don't get in" percentages for many universities!

        I reiterate, Trump doesn't seem to know or care that the arts matter. He should since, in a 2005  Harris poll, 93% of those surveyed agreed that "The arts are vital to providing a well rounded education for children."  86%  agreed that "an arts education encourages and assists in the improvement of a child's attitudes toward school."  80% agreed that "incorporating the arts into education is the first step in adding back what's missing from public education today."  So let's get this straight. He isn't responding to the multitude of the American people.

        Not having been a public school student, and relegated to military school (I can understand why, now) Mr. Trump simply has no soul where the arts are concerned. his apparent standard for art is to be found in the number of expensive portraits of himself which he has commissioned and paid for with what his contributors thought were charitable donations. Further proof is apparent in his selection of a moronic pyramid scheme princess  as SecEd, a post for which she is singularly unqualified.


       Write, call,  or e-mail your  Congressperson, tell them to leave arts funding alone. After all, it is one of the few remaining vestiges of  civilization we still have.

No comments:

Post a Comment