Monday, August 5, 2019

(Not so) Random Thoughts From the News




Two mass shootings in the space of 24 hours.

       You want to see crass, callous and devoid of humanity. Try this: “GOP Lawmaker Blames Obama for Mass Shootings”

       Ohio state Rep. Candice Keller (R) blamed the mass murders in Dayton over the weekend on gay marriage, recreational marijuana, video games and former President Barack Obama among other things, WBNS reports.
                            


The face of self-serving political drivel

        Keller began her post by saying “liberals start the blame game” after every mass shooting and “why not place the blame where it belongs?”  

       Apparently it’s all the fault (like everything else in Trump’s America) of a President who has been out of office 2 ½ years. Of course, these remarks followed the shootings in El Paso and Dayton, both of which were committed by persons far more in tune with Ms. Keller than Barack Obama. 

       This waste of flesh has blamed others, including “Drag Queens” (yep!)  for most social ills caused by the current administration.  On the other hand, acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, declared: “I don’t think it’s fair to lay this at the feet of the president.” Ok, now I get it. It depends on who’s the President. Silly me.

        Her President’s rather perfunctory remarks are, to say the least a little puzzling and a lot mawkish. While his initial post shooting Tweet was appropriate, if minimalist, a subsequent effort produced a more Trumpish effort, suggesting stronger background checks but tacitly placating his NRA masters by omitting any comment regarding automatic and assault weapons, which were involved in these and other high fatality mass shootings.

        “Republicans and Democrats must come together and get strong background checks, perhaps marrying this legislation with desperately needed immigration reform. We must have something good, if not GREAT, come out of these two tragic events!”

       Let’s parse this a bit. Background checks already exist. Could they be better? Surely. However, gun shows (unmentioned) offer a gaping loophole, since most states don’t require background checks for firearms sold or traded at gun shows by private individuals. Federal law requires background checks on guns sold by federally licensed (FFL) dealers only. Weird, huh? Ask yourself where you’d shop if you wanted to amass automatic weapons with minimum notice.

       Secondarily, the tie-in he mentions to immigration reform is relatively meaningless, since the issue here is high fire rate guns, and their availability. The two recent atrocities were accomplished by native born white males, So was Stoneybrook , so was Columbine, so was Aurora, and so was the granddaddy of them all, Las Vegas..

       Finally, and perhaps most disappointing, but not uncharacteristic, is the ubiquitous Trump superlative, (GREAT) used meaninglessly or at least inappropriately, in this context while dealing with tragedy.  

       What did Mr. Trump do then? He went to play golf. But wait, what did he tell us as candidate Trump?

"I would not be a president who took vacations. I would not be a president that takes time off.”

“We pay for Obama's travel so he can fundraise millions so Democrats can run on lies. Then we pay for his golf.”

“Can you believe that, with all of the problems and difficulties facing the U.S., President Obama spent the day playing golf? Worse than Carter.” (Jimmy Carter rarely golfed, preferring to fly fish at Camp David on working weekends, but Trump either didn’t know or care)

Now, reality check before returning to gun issues: 

Trump golf costs now exceed  $110 Million — This is more than the GAO estimate for all Of Obama’s Travel! (Note this is only golf for Trump and amassed in 2 ½ years as opposed to 8!!)

A Conservative group, Judicial Watch, once criticized Obama for spending $106 million for travel over his two full terms. Trump’s golf tab has surpassed that in just 30 months. And yet….Republican tunnel vision?

        So, what was Barack Obama’s reaction in a similar situation? He didn’t tweet. He spoke to the nation, pausing to wipe tears several times. He spoke as a parent and a compassionate man. He visited a vigil at Stony Brook, hugged bereaved parents, issued a proclamation ordering flags at half-staff. And, as he paused twice during the address to compose himself, he  expressed "enormous sympathy for families that are affected."  Gosh I miss the man!

        By comparison, Alex Jones, conspiracy theorist, certifiable lunatic and radio talk-show host in Austin, Texas, had as his guest the morning of the shooting, as chance would have it, Donald Trump. Jones had praised Trump, claiming that ninety per cent of his listeners were Trump supporters, and Trump had returned the favor, saying, “Your reputation is amazing. I will not let you down.” This is the same Alex Jones who then claimed the “No one really died at Newtown”, and that, “Like other mass shootings, staged by the government”, in Newtown, Connecticut, and elsewhere, this was a “false flag” operation." If we measure an individual by the company they keep, then this is sadly indicative of the real Donald Trump.

       The “rest of the story” here is that for years after the Stoneybrook shootings, bereaved parents were dogged, physically threatened, even forced to relocate, by gullible persons egged on by Jones and his “Info Wars” listeners until Jones, facing massive civil suits, at last acknowledged the falsehood of his entire fake news operation and, in great measure, his own mental illness.”

        There have been school shootings in the United States documented since the 1840s. From 1900 through 1949, 56 such incidents were recorded (note this is school shootings only, there have been many more mass shootings.) In these 56 incidents, 41 individuals were killed, I almost said “only” 41, but to the families of the dead even though they are unaware of this essay, that would be insulting. Sadly, there have been more deadly and more frequent incidents since.

        Two of these alone, Sandy Hook and Marjorie Stoneman Douglas, resulted in 45 deaths and many more injuries. The deadly difference of course is automatic weapons. In fact, of the 25 most deadly mass shootings in US history, all but one involved the use of automatic or semi-automatic handguns and assault rifles. Of the ten with the most fatalities, all perpetrators were males and legally in the USA, nine were native born US citizens, while one was a South Korean exchange student (Va Tech.)   In these shootings alone, nine involved massive use of automatic weapons, handguns and long guns. The one exception was former Marine, Charles Whitman, who, after killing his wife and mother climbed up the bell tower at UT Austin with three rifles, four pistols and a sawed-off shotgun. He killed 19 by sniping until he was shot by law enforcement.  Like far too many of these perpetrators, Whitman had shown obvious signs of mental disturbance well before his fatal actions.

         The same emotional disturbance flags were present at Stoneman Douglas and Stoneybrook and, in fact, nine of the ten most horrific shootings in our history. Most of the perpetrators should never have been allowed to own firearms, or at least, have access to high fire automatic weapons. A valid background check would have disqualified at least 7 of them from weapons ownership.

       What do “objective experts” (excluding the NRA, which is neither) believe are at the roots of these incidents?

      There have been opinions that several possible factors may work together to create a fertile environment for mass murder in the United States. 
Most commonly suggested include:
(The first is of a principal concern, since the first prerequisite for mass gun violence is a weapon, and an automatic one.)
·      
Higher accessibility and ownership of guns. The US has the highest per-capita gun ownership in the world with 120.5 firearms per 100 people; the second highest is Yemen with 52.8 firearms per 100 people. This, as a standalone statistic, is less impressive than it’s ranking. Every male in Switzerland is issued a military weapon. There are 28 weapons for every 100 Swiss, but proportionally far, far, fewer shootings. The big NRA lie is to scare responsible gun owners with the bogey man scare tactic that the “The government wants to take away all your guns.”  No rational individual has proposed that, or will; responsible hunters should take care of their guns (locked cases) but that is far from confiscation. However, it is also true that no deer hunter needs automatic weapons. I have personal knowledge of an individual, employed in law enforcement, who, convinced that, “Obama will take away our guns”, hurried after the 2008 election to purchase 2 semi-automatic rifles.  

   
Mental illness and its treatment (or the lack thereof) with psychiatric drugs. This is somewhat controversial from a statistical point of view.  Many of the mass shooters in the U.S. suffered from mental illness, but the estimated (note: I did not say “diagnosed”) number of mental illness cases has not increased as significantly as the number of mass shootings. Under 5% of violent behaviors in the U.S. are committed by persons with mental health diagnoses. In truth, the significance of this factoid has been inflated by both sides of the issue.)  Conservatives cite it as justification for allowing persons with emotional issues (including veterans diagnosed with PTSD (Chris Kyle??) to own guns. Others cite the low overall violence rate, but as I showed above, mental issues factor heavily in almost all of the 10 most deadly mass shootings in our history.

·      
The desire to seek revenge for a long history of being bullied at school. In recent years, citizens calling themselves "targeted individual" have cited adult bullying campaigns as a reason for their deadly violence.

·       
The widespread chronic gap between people's expectations for themselves and their actual achievement, and individualistic culture. This could probably be broadened to incorporate such other dystopian relatively new issues as “incel” persons. (look it up if you must)

·      
Desire for fame and notoriety. Also, mass shooters learn from one another through "media contagion," that is, mass media coverage of them and the proliferation of social media sites that tend to glorify the shooters and downplay the victims." As an individual with a pretty fair appreciation of Psychology, especially of adolescents, I think this may be understated, and linked to the issue above, personal under-achievement and poor self-image, whatever the reason.

·       The copycat phenomenon.

·       Failure of government background checks due to incomplete databases and/or staff shortages. This is also farther down this list than I feel it should be. Aurora, Stoneman Douglas and several others of the “top ten” clearly indicate that reasonable background checks would never have place automatic weapons in the hand of either Holmes or Cruz. The Pulse shooter had disqualifying issues as well. The NRA response to this, of course is that “They would have gotten them somewhere else.”  How about if the firearm manufacturer and/or the dealer were held criminally and civilly liable for failing to do due diligence? How about allowing or, better yet, requiring, mental health professionals to notify the federal data base with concerns without recrimination? And oh yeah, how about parents observing their children a bit closer. Columbine anyone?   

So, there you have it for today. No good news.

Oh wait, in the local section of today’s paper, as is usual, they print news articles form various states, since all of us are from somewhere else in The Villages. Today’s hot item from Idaho, was the announcement that main street traffic lines in Boise were to be repainted, since recent lane changes had confused residents.

How’s that? Sorry.

No comments:

Post a Comment