Wednesday, July 29, 2020

Beware the Law of Unintended Consequences



       Dr. Stella Immanuel is a self-described "wealth transfer coach", and has authored several books as part of her Occupying Force series. She has been an outspoken supporter of Donald Trump, and long-time critic of "unmarried couples living together, homosexuality, bestiality, polygamy" and so-called "homosexual terrorism".

       Sadly, for the gullible, Immanuel's medical claims are sometimes combined with her spiritual beliefs. She has said that many gynecological illnesses are the result of having sex dreams with succubi and incubi (male and female demons) and receiving "demon sperm". She has said that endometriosis, infertility, miscarriages, and sexually transmitted infections are caused by these spirit husbands and spirit wives. According to Immanuel, the causes of cysts and endometriosis are individuals having sex in their dreams with demons and witches. She said in a 2015 sermon that space alien DNA is used in medical treatments and that reptilians and aliens run the government. She also stated in 2015 that Illuminati are using witches to destroy the world through abortion, gay marriage, children's toys and media such as Harry Potter, Pokémon, Wizards of Waverly Place and Hannah Montana. In another 2015 sermon, she said scientists are developing vaccines to stop people from being religious. In layman’s terms this bag of misinformation and superstitious drivel is as loony as a shit house mouse and about as rational as Michele Bachmann on meth.

        Tragically, some who deny Global Warming in the face of real-world data and contiguous evidence (chains of related events), will believe this off the wall Cameroonian nutter. Real scientists, in multiple studies, have debunked her claims related to any real effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine as a “cure” for Covid 19. Of course, Trump, himself the poster child for the reality challenged, is a believer. As Ron White famously stated: “You can’t fix stupid.”   

        There is another, far more Karmic, pattern being seen as relates to severity and in fact susceptibility to Covid 19 and that is a Mayo clinic and Harvard study which seems to  verify earlier studies from Europe which go a long way to explaining the seemingly much lower susceptibility to and severity of the infection in some younger persons. The study, not yet peer reviewed, as it was just completed, is entitled  "Exploratory analysis of immunization records highlights decreased
SARS-CoV-2 rates in individuals with recent non-COVID-19 vaccinations" and can be found in its entirety here:

 https://www.medrxiv.org/…/10…/2020.07.27.20161976v1.full.pdf

 
        It revolves around other anti-viral anti-bodies present in these populations because of ….wait for it…..MMR vaccinations and several other related vaccines (Hep A & B, Flu, Pneumonia and several others). Areas where MMR is a routine vaccination from around the world report lower incidence of infection and less severe courses of disease in young persons into early adulthood. If you want the technical explanation, here it is as brief as it can be and still be understandable:  

         “The ability of live attenuated vaccines to train the immune system against non-targeted pathogens (ed: in this case Covid-19) by training the host system against a variety of infections is a key feature of this approach. Evidence of its efficacy is growing. Traditional vaccines seek to activate the adaptive immune system by causing the T- and B-lymphocytes to recognize specific pathogen. Then when a similar pathogen is encountered later, the adaptive immune system will remember that pathogen and launch a defense.

       The innate immune system works differently. It recognizes a pathogen through a system of pattern recognition receptors that quickly activate the host defense. The innate immune system does not, however, possess immunologic memory. During the past several years, clinical trials have shown that the innate immune cells – monocytes, macrophages and NK cells, for example – can confer protection from certain infections independently of the lymphocytes. Notably, this system provides nonspecific protection against infections unrelated to the target pathogen of the particular vaccine.

        As an example, MMR vaccinations are given to all U.S. Navy recruits; researchers pointed out. The markedly milder symptoms seen in the 955 sailors on the USS Roosevelt who tested positive for COVID-19 (with only one hospitalization), are a real-world illustration of this effect. (This also is in light of a crew of 3,532 in close contact during the viral latency period with only 27% becoming symptomatic!)

       Additional data noted a correlation between people in geographical locations who routinely receive the MMR vaccine and reduced COVID-19 death rates. Research shows that countries with recent vaccination campaigns against measles-rubella have fewer COVID-19 deaths.

      There is a further correlation between those born after about 1971, when MMR vaccination became widespread, and low incidence of COVID-19. Hong Kong, for example, had 1,128 cases as of June 19, and 1,074 who had recovered from COVID-19. Only four people died. That’s a fatality rate of 0.4% in a population of 7.5 million. To date the US death rate is almost 10 times as high as Hong Kong, one of the most densely populated places in the world, at over 17,000 per square mile. The reason for such a low incidence rate may be the free MMR vaccination program instituted in 2019, for all adult healthcare workers, airport staff and foreign domestic helpers, and the 1997 mass immunization campaign for people from infancy to age 19.  

       I said at the outset that this was Karmic. By that I meant that those anti-vaxxers who, citing completely discredited hysteria regarding vaccines, refuse to give their offspring protection against common childhood diseases which can be fatal, may also have placed them at much greater risk of Covid 19.

       California mandates full vaccination panels prior to entering childcare or school. Of almost 40,000 cases in the age 0 to 17 range, there have been zero deaths. The age 18-34 group (residual MMR effects ?) has by far the lowest percentage of deaths of  the rest. The next age group - 35 to 49 - has over four times as many deaths. This is consistent with the general belief among immunologists that the effects of MMR last, in general, about 20 years. Very few adults ever get a “booster.”
Now for my editorial opinion vice data: (well ok, some data)

        As previously stated, California mandates MMR. Period. No personal or religious exemptions allowed for public school children. Its neighbor to the north, Oregon allows exemption from any and all vaccines, simply on an “I don’t wanna” basis. No reason or certificate required. Unsurprisingly, Oregon is a hotbed of the anti-vaxx movement and sentiment.  Rates of unvaccinated children for “philosophical” reasons in Oregon have been on the rise since 2015. In fact, as ludicrous as it seems to the rational mind, considering measles can, and did at one time, kill children, 7.5 percent of children in kindergarten in Oregon are currently not vaccinated with one or more shots because of a nonmedical exemption. Consequently, Oregon has had three measles outbreaks in recent years. So, would we expect Oregon to also have a higher rate of Covid infection among younger groups if all the above is realistic? The data below is from the Lagrande (Oregon) Observer:

       “The number of COVID-19 cases in the state of Oregon doubled during the month of June, and the population of Oregonians accounting for the majority of the increase in COVID-19 cases in the last month was younger, an analysis of the data from Oregon Health Authority finds.
Ages 0-9 saw a 391% increase (65 on May 31, 254 new cases in June), and 10-19 jumped 258% (179 on May 31, 462 new cases in June).”     
        For comparison, California (mandatory vax) had just 1.9% in the 1 to 5 age range (less than half or Oregon’s 4% figure) and 7% in the 5-17 age group (30% lower than Oregon). Oregon has a far lower population density, yet still manages to have more sick kids on a percentage basis. Why? I think we know why. The sole relevant variable is MMR vaccination.

Beware the law of unintended consequences!

No comments:

Post a Comment